2006
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Year Changes in Bone Mineral Density Around the Knee After a Six-Month Course of Oral Alendronate Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: A six-month course of alendronate initially increased bone mineral density at six and twelve months after total knee arthroplasty, but no difference was noted after thirty-six months. The effect of alendronate on bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty may be limited after discontinuation of therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although speculative, a lower initial BMD brought about by stress shielding may lead to earlier symptomatic loosening when particulate debris increases with time. This is important, as there is evidence that initial BMD may be maintained by intervention with bisphosphonates [27]. At 2 years, there was no difference in BMD change between the rotating-and fixed-platform knees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although speculative, a lower initial BMD brought about by stress shielding may lead to earlier symptomatic loosening when particulate debris increases with time. This is important, as there is evidence that initial BMD may be maintained by intervention with bisphosphonates [27]. At 2 years, there was no difference in BMD change between the rotating-and fixed-platform knees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One meta-analysis [7] and two RCTs [8,9] were retrieved from the literature search (Table 1). One of the RCTs [9] was issued one year after publication of the meta-analysis in 2005.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the RCTs [9] was issued one year after publication of the meta-analysis in 2005. The other RCT [8] was published in 2000 but was not included in the meta-analysis because the latter focused on studies that used dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to measure BMD changes from baseline, whereas the former employed radiostereometry to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonates on implant migration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations