bT richomonas vaginalis is the most common nonviral etiology of sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide (1). The OSOM Trichomonas rapid test (OSOM; Sekisui Diagnostics, San Diego, CA) is a rapid surrogate to microscopic analysis in symptomatic patients (2), but its performance in low-prevalence STI populations has been assessed on a limited basis in the literature (3). OSOM has widespread usage, as accreditation data from the College of American Pathologists report that over 300 participant laboratories utilize this assay on an annual basis (4). We sought to characterize the analytical and clinical performance of OSOM in a low-prevalence STI population on the basis of a commercial transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) reference.Results from the performance of OSOM with 1,421 consecutive vaginal saline suspensions were audited from a 4-month interval in a low-prevalence southeastern Wisconsin STI population (5). The concomitant Aptima specimen transport tube from the health care encounter (98.7% endocervical, 1.3% vaginal), previously subjected to Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae TMA (Aptima Combo 2 assay; Hologic, San Diego, CA), was forwarded for retrospective T. vaginalis TMA (Aptima Trichomonas vaginalis assay; Hologic) evaluation on a TIGRIS direct tube sampling (DTS) system per the manufacturer's specifications (6). A previous assessment of T. vaginalis TMA showed 100% molecular concordance between the data from vaginal saline suspension aliquots and endocervical specimens maintained in Aptima specimen transport tubes (7). In addition, Napierala et al. (8) have shown equivalent T. vaginalis TMA detection rates from endocervical swabs and vaginal swabs in our population. This study was governed by the Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare Institutional Review Board.The low-prevalence STI population exhibited TMA detection rates of 6.4% and 0.6% for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, respectively, while the T. vaginalis TMA detection rate was 4.0%. On the basis of a T. vaginalis TMA reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of OSOM were 35.1% and 99.9%, respectively (Table 1). The kappa value for this data set was 0.502 (95% confidence interval, 0.346 to 0.658), and agreement was 0.973 (95% confidence interval, 0.963 to 0.981).In an analogous fashion, 98 consecutive tandem vaginal saline suspensions and endocervical swabs from an increased-prevalence STI setting (C. trachomatis TMA detection rate, 11.2%; N. gonorrhoeae TMA detection rate, 6.1%; setting characterized previously [7,9]) were retrospectively analyzed via OSOM and T. vaginalis TMA, respectively, per the manufacturer's guidelines (2, 6). Improved concordance between OSOM and T. vaginalis TMA was observed within this study set, with a 21.4% T. vaginalis TMA detection rate (Table 2). An increased kappa value of 0.904 (95% confidence interval, 0.797 to 1.000) was calculated, with agreement of 0.969 (95% confidence interval, 0.907 to 0.992).Campbell et al. (3) reported 94.7% sensitivity for OSOM compared to microscopy in a ...