1994
DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-year-olds Remember a Novel Event from 20 Months: Evidence for Long-term Memory in Children?

Abstract: Thirty-seven 3-year-old children, who had learned a 9-action event sequence ("making Play-Doh spaghetti") when they were 20 months old, returned to the lab to determine whether they would be able to verbally and/or behaviourally recall the event after a 12- to 22-month delay. Children originally participated in the event either one or three times and experienced different parts of the event either at three distinct locations (spatial condition) or at a single location (nonspatial condition). Results show very … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Boyer et al (1994) failed to find any effect of repeated experience on 3-year-olds' recall of an event they had enacted 12 to 22 months in the past. Participants were 20 months old at the time of their initial exposure to a nine-action event of making Play-Doh.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Boyer et al (1994) failed to find any effect of repeated experience on 3-year-olds' recall of an event they had enacted 12 to 22 months in the past. Participants were 20 months old at the time of their initial exposure to a nine-action event of making Play-Doh.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…If reenactment operates in a manner similar to reactivation, it should also be more effective after a time delay than shortly after training. This could explain the discrepant findings on effects of reenactment found by Boyer et al (1994) and by Fivush and Hamond (1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Timing of reenactment can explain why positive effects of reenactment were obtained by Fivush and Hamond (1989) but not by Boyer et al (1994). Children in Fivush and Hamond's investigation reenacted events after 2 weeks, whereas reenactment occurred within a 1 week period in Boyer et al's investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Why opposite effects should be found across the two studies is as yet unclear. Furthermore, Boyer, Barron, and Farrar (1994) failed to obtain any evidence, in either verbal protocols or nonverbal imitation, of memory in 2-year-old children of an activity (making PlayDoh spaghetti) learned over a year previously. This result is clearly at odds with other findings.…”
Section: The Development Of Episodic Memorymentioning
confidence: 72%