2018
DOI: 10.1177/1526602818799736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Year Results of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Infrapopliteal Arteries

Abstract: Midterm follow-up demonstrates excellent safety, patency, and freedom from CD-TLR rates using the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold below the knee.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite lack of superior outcomes in the coronary arteries, a recent trial demonstrated the short‐term safety of an Absorb BVS in simple lesions below the knee, reporting excellent 12‐month vessel patency rates and most recently at 36 months . The aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Absorb BVS in complex, infrapopliteal lesions for the management of chronic limb ischemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite lack of superior outcomes in the coronary arteries, a recent trial demonstrated the short‐term safety of an Absorb BVS in simple lesions below the knee, reporting excellent 12‐month vessel patency rates and most recently at 36 months . The aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Absorb BVS in complex, infrapopliteal lesions for the management of chronic limb ischemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial experiences with non‐drug eluting BRS yielded comparable immediate angiographic results to metal stents, but improvements of mechanical characteristics and addition of an antiproliferative drug appeared necessary to reduce the restenosis rate during the resorption period . A more refined drug‐eluting BRS technology in the form of coronary ABSORB BVS was used in the below the knee territory with sustained good results out to 3 years . The only dedicated BRS for peripheral use demonstrated favorable results out to 2 years in a first‐in‐human study, 9 but overall progress has been slow, proving that a quick transformation of technically viable coronary BRS technology into peripheral application is not warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the long‐term outcomes of BRS in the coronary setting have been disappointing in comparison to metallic DES, peripheral arteries have a different pathological (diffuse atherosclerosis with higher occurrence of chronic occlusions) and physiological (different healing and restenotic response) profile . Hence, some of the presumed benefits of BRS like the restoration of artery plasticity and the capacity to improve lumen patency over time may still be attainable in PAD at a more favorable risk‐to‐benefit ratio than in the coronary arteries; however, there have been very few reports on peripheral use of BRS to date . We conducted a preclinical pilot study evaluating operational performance, pharmacokinetics, and long‐term durability and biocompatibility of a novel sirolimus‐eluting balloon‐expandable BRS (Credence BRS, Meril Life Sciences, Gujarat, India).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Contrarily, early and midterm results of BVS implantation in infrapopliteal arteries were encouraging. [13][14][15] The current report presents the early and midterm experience with the Absorb BVS in a cohort of patients with CLTI from the DISAPEAR (Drug Impregnated Bioresorbable Stent in Asian Population Extremity Arterial Revascularization) registry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%