2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-year stability of open-bite correction by 1-piece maxillary osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
34
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the group of 41 high-angle patients treated with bimaxillary surgery, one third of those having overjet > 6 mm before surgery, still had an overjet > 6 mm after 3 years. Of 40 open-bite patients treated by isolated LeFort I impaction, 88% had positive overbite 3 years post-surgery (Espeland et al, 2008a). In all the remaining patients, the negative overbite was less than 1 mm.…”
Section: Occlusal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the group of 41 high-angle patients treated with bimaxillary surgery, one third of those having overjet > 6 mm before surgery, still had an overjet > 6 mm after 3 years. Of 40 open-bite patients treated by isolated LeFort I impaction, 88% had positive overbite 3 years post-surgery (Espeland et al, 2008a). In all the remaining patients, the negative overbite was less than 1 mm.…”
Section: Occlusal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). In a study of 40 consecutively operated patients (Espeland et al, 2008a) it was observed that impaction of posterior maxilla (≥ 2 mm) relapsed by one third. Inferior movement of the anterior maxilla relapsed about two thirds.…”
Section: Open Bite Correction By Isolated Maxillary Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present systematic review, eight studies used the non-extraction method to correct AOB (8,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)18,19), five studies used extraction and non-extraction patients (7,9,10,17,24), and one study used only extraction cases (20). Out of five studies that compared extraction and non-extraction methods to treat open-bite malocclusion, four studies (7,9,17,24) did not find any statistically significant difference between extraction and non-extraction methods in long-term stability of treated open-bite, whereas the study by Janson et al (10) showed that the subjects with extraction presented with a high level of stability (74.2%) compared to non-extraction cases (61.9%).…”
Section: Stability Of Corrected Aob With or Without Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include severity of AOB malocclusion prior to treatment, extractions of premolars, correction of open-bite with or without orthognathic surgery, or different methods of retention (4,5). Recently, many studies have been conducted to check the long-term stability of corrected AOB malocclusion (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). When we searched the literature, we came across two systematic reviews of case series studies conducted to assess the effectiveness of orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in AOB correction (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high incidence of relapse, even in those cases where treatment involves surgery, is one of the major concerns when treating open bites [7,8]. Tongue thrust is associated with this kind of malocclusion and has been reported as one of the major causes of relapse [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%