2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2017.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold functions for small subgraphs: an analytic approach

Abstract: We revisit the problem of counting the number of copies of a fixed graph in a random graph or multigraph, including the case of constrained degrees. Our approach relies heavily on analytic combinatorics and on the notion of patchwork to describe the possible overlapping of copies.This paper is a version, extended to include proofs, of the paper with the same title to be presented at the Eurocomb 2017 meeting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• We apply an inclusion-exclusion technique to remove loops and double edges from multigraphs, turning them into graphs. Collet and coworkers [7] have recently extended this new approach to enumerate graphs with forbidden subgraphs, and to count the occurrences of subgraphs from a given family in random graphs. • New exact expressions for the generating functions of interesting families of (multi)graphs are derived, including multigraphs with a given excess and degree constraints (Proposition 1), and graphs and multigraphs without trees and unicycles (Propositions 3 and 6).…”
Section: Motivations and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…• We apply an inclusion-exclusion technique to remove loops and double edges from multigraphs, turning them into graphs. Collet and coworkers [7] have recently extended this new approach to enumerate graphs with forbidden subgraphs, and to count the occurrences of subgraphs from a given family in random graphs. • New exact expressions for the generating functions of interesting families of (multi)graphs are derived, including multigraphs with a given excess and degree constraints (Proposition 1), and graphs and multigraphs without trees and unicycles (Propositions 3 and 6).…”
Section: Motivations and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already observed by Flajolet and coworkers [16] and Janson and coworkers [18], multigraphs are better suited for generating function manipulations than graphs. We use the model of Collet and coworkers [7], distinct but related to the one used by Flajolet and coworkers [16] and Janson and coworkers [18], and recall the link between the generating functions of graphs and multigraphs in Lemma 3. The difference between graphs and multigraphs is that multigraphs have labeled and oriented edges, and are permitted loops and multiple edges.…”
Section: Multigraph Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations