2004
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2004.838738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Values and Convergence Properties of Majority-Based Algorithms for Decoding Regular Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Codes 2-5 are taken from [10]. Codes 2, 3 and 5 have variable node and check node degrees (3,6), (4,36) and (3,6), respectively. Code 4 is constructed by the progressive-edge-growth (PEG) algorithm [11] and has a variable node degree 3.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Codes 2-5 are taken from [10]. Codes 2, 3 and 5 have variable node and check node degrees (3,6), (4,36) and (3,6), respectively. Code 4 is constructed by the progressive-edge-growth (PEG) algorithm [11] and has a variable node degree 3.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codes 7 and 8 both have variable node degree 5 and check node degree 6. Codes 7 and 8 are decoded by MB algorithm of order zero (MB0), while all the other codes are decoded by GA. For the degree distributions of Codes 7 and 8, MB0 has a better threshold than GA algorithm [3]. The Tanner graphs of the codes do not have cycles of length 4.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such algorithms, which are referred to as hard-decision iterative algorithms, are the subject of this paper. Examples are the so-called Gallager algorithms A (GA) and B (GB) [1], [2], [3], their variants [4] and majoritybased (MB) algorithms [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%