“…We now compare with the existing methods that are provably tolerable to the outliers. The methods are covered by a recent review in (Lerman and Maunu, 2018, Table I), including the Geodesic Gradient Descent (GGD) , Fast Median Subspace (FMS) , REAPER (Lerman et al, 2015a), Geometric Median Subspace (GMS) , 2,1 -RPCA (Xu et al, 2010) (which is called Outlier Pursuit (OP) in (Lerman and Maunu, 2018, Table I)), Tyler M-Estimator (TME) (Zhang, 2016), Thresholding-based Outlier Robust PCA (TORP) (Cherapanamjeri et al, 2017) and the Coherence Pursuit (CoP) (Rahmani and Atia, 2016). However, we note that the comparison maynot be very fair since the results summarized in (Lerman and Maunu, 2018, Table I) are established for random Gaussian models where the columns of O and X are drawn independently and uniformly at random from the distribtuion N (0, 1 D I) and N (0, 1 d SS T ) with S ∈ R D×d being an orthonormal basis of the inlier subspace S. Nevertheless, these two random models are closely related since each columns of O or X in the random Gaussian model is also concentrated around the sphere S D−1 , especially when d is large.…”