The Challenge Assessment of learners using a multifaceted approach is an essential component of the graduate medical education (GME) system across the globe. Clinical competency committees (CCCs) are expected to aggregate and synthesize individual assessments to inform faculty, program leadership, and learners of the given learner's progress toward unsupervised practice. The challenge for CCCs is that through these assessments, the committee must engage in a deliberate discussion of each learner, identifying areas of weakness or accelerated growth, and develop and implement individualized learning plans. Much remains to be learned about optimizing the CCC structure and process to facilitate robust developmental assessments, and actionable feedback to learners and, at the aggregate level, to program leaders. This Rip Out draws on studies of group process from other fields and published evidence to provide guidance regarding CCC structure, membership, and processes. 1,2 What Is Known & Group Structure and Membership. Diverse groups tend to make better decisions than homogeneous ones. CCCs should ensure that membership is balanced in academic rank, gender, expertise, and roles within the program. 2 Nonphysician health professionals can bring an important perspective, especially in the domains of interpersonal skills and communication, and professionalism.