1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(79)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thresholds for detection and feeding behavior in the dungeness crab, Cancer magister (Dana)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of pre-EMF exposure flicking rate averaged between 5.6 to 40 flicks/min, which was consistent with the flicking rate of a resting Dungeness crab found in Pearson et al (1979;5 to 47 flicks/min). The mean pre-exposure flicking rate was 17 ± 3.6 flicks/min.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of pre-EMF exposure flicking rate averaged between 5.6 to 40 flicks/min, which was consistent with the flicking rate of a resting Dungeness crab found in Pearson et al (1979;5 to 47 flicks/min). The mean pre-exposure flicking rate was 17 ± 3.6 flicks/min.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Initial tests were designed to assess whether crab could detect EMF fields by measuring a sensory receptor response, the antennular flicking rate before and during an acute EMF exposure. Similar to tests discussed above, these experiments were based on a previous body of work and protocols that examined antennular flicking rate in Dungeness crab as a quantitative measure of chemosensory acuity in the water column for food extracts (Pearson et al 1979), petroleum hydrocarbons (Pearson et al 1980(Pearson et al , 1981 and salinity (Sugarman et al 1983). The antennules are involved primarily in recognition of chemical signatures in the water column.…”
Section: Discussion Of Potential Emf Effects and Fy 2012 Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thin shell of Nuttalia and its high ratio of tissue to shell size underscore its dependence upon refuges to minimize exposure to predators. Native crabs readily consume local hardshell venerid clams, e.g., Protothaca staminea and Tapes japonica (itself a nonnative species) (Pearson et al 1979(Pearson et al , 1981Boulding 1984;Juanes and Hartwick 1990), which live in similar habitats often contiguous to, or sometimes overlapping with, Nuttallia. These hardshell clams require up to 7-8 times the pressure to crack compared to a Nuttallia of equal tissue mass (J.E.…”
Section: Implications For Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorebirds use tactile senses of their bill, which can be affected by microhabitat features limiting penetration into the sediment (Mouritsen and Jensen, 1992;Piersma et al, 1995). Crabs may be intermediate between shorebirds and rays in capabilities of detection of infaunal prey, in that they utilize a combination of highly sensitive chemo-senses for prey detection at a distance (Pearson et al, 1979;Zimmer-Faust et al, 1996) and chemo-tactile senses within the substrate, which are also affected by sediment features (Arnold, 1994;Lipcius and Hines, 1986;Spronaugle and Lawton, 1990;Eggleston et al, 1992;Skilleter, 1994). At the highest prey densities we measured in our study, the aggregative response of eagle rays did not appear to produce interference or facilitation that altered prey removal rates, but we do not know the interaction between predator and prey densities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%