2019
DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombocytopenia and Procedural Prophylaxis in the Era of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists

Abstract: Thrombocytopenia is common in patients with advanced liver disease. These patients frequently require invasive diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in the setting of thrombocytopenia. A common platelet goal before such procedures is ≥50,000/μL, but target levels vary by provider and the procedure. Platelet transfusion has disadvantages, including safety and cost. No other short‐term options for ameliorating thrombocytopenia before procedures were available until the thrombopoietin receptor agonists were recent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(109 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of association with platelet count also has particular clinical relevance because providers are often reluctant to perform procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia, and several new thrombopoietin agonists have been developed for this purpose. Notably, despite the improvement in platelet counts seen with these agents, more robust outcomes data are needed to establish their efficacy in reducing bleeding ( 30 ). These findings suggest that provider perceptions of bleeding risk due to thrombocytopenia may be disproportionate to the actual risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of association with platelet count also has particular clinical relevance because providers are often reluctant to perform procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia, and several new thrombopoietin agonists have been developed for this purpose. Notably, despite the improvement in platelet counts seen with these agents, more robust outcomes data are needed to establish their efficacy in reducing bleeding ( 30 ). These findings suggest that provider perceptions of bleeding risk due to thrombocytopenia may be disproportionate to the actual risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, four TPO-agonists (eltrombopag, romiplostim, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag) have been approved for HCV-related TCP. 34 , 36 39 Eltrombopag, as mentioned above, is an orally active TPO-agonist that increases differentiation of bone marrow progenitor cells leading to production of megakaryocytes. 34 , 36 , 40 Romiplostim is a polypeptide composed of four TPO mimetic peptides that dimerize TPO, leading to increase Plt production.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 36 , 37 The two newest medications, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag, are both non-peptide oral TPO agonists. 39 By July 2019, the USA’s Federal Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency had approved all medications, except romiplostim, for treatment of TCP in chronic HCV patients. 41 – 46 Eltrombopag and romiplostim were additionally approved for ITP.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28][29][30] In general, CLD patients with platelet counts < − 50 × 10 9 /L are considered to be at high risk for procedurerelated bleeding. 31 In this analysis, more patients in the lusutrombopag group achieved a platelet count > − 50 × 10 9 /L at least once during the study and at the platelet transfusion assessment. The majority of patients in the lusutrombopag group experienced a > − 1.5-fold increase and approximately 50% had at least a doubling in their platelet count from baseline, including those patients with baseline platelet counts <20 × 10 9 /L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%