2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombotic complications with interruption of direct oral anticoagulants in dermatologic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 13 articles, four were prospective observational cohort studies, one was a retrospective case-control study, and the remaining eight were retrospective observational cohort studies (Appendix S1). [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Over 12 years, there were 10,750 patients who underwent cutaneous surgery, with 1,312 of them performed on patients prescribed a DOAC. The mean participant age ranged from 68 to 78.8 years of age, with a male predominance (49.9-81.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 13 articles, four were prospective observational cohort studies, one was a retrospective case-control study, and the remaining eight were retrospective observational cohort studies (Appendix S1). [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Over 12 years, there were 10,750 patients who underwent cutaneous surgery, with 1,312 of them performed on patients prescribed a DOAC. The mean participant age ranged from 68 to 78.8 years of age, with a male predominance (49.9-81.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included articles studied four areas: (1) complication rate in those who continued DOAC therapy, 15,16 (2) complication rate in those who ceased DOAC therapy prior to undergoing skin surgery, 17,18 (3) complication rate between patients who had their DOAC therapy ceased vs continued, 19 and (4) comparing complication rate in patients anticoagulated with a DOAC agent vs a control group not on a DOAC agent (Table 1). [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Outcomes DOAC continuation Antia et al 15 evaluated 76 MMS on patients who were prescribed a DOAC, resulting in one mild bleeding complication in a person taking rivaroxaban (1.32%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a retrospective study found that perioperative NOAC interruption during dermatologic surgery was associated with a low incidence of thrombotic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or a history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. 12 In light of these data, it may be reasonable to consider NOAC interruption in specific patient populations on combination therapy if large repairs or significant undermining are expected. Any decisions to modify a patient's anticoagulation regimen should be made in collaboration with the patient and the physician managing the patient's antithrombotic medications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A recent study demonstrated that the peri-operative withholding of DOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or a history of venous thromboembolism during dermatologic surgery appears to be safe and efficacious. 7 Nonetheless, it should be noted that the risk of bleeding complications in patients taking DOACs may be limited by meticulous surgical techniques, elaborate haemostasis, pressure dressings, and close postoperative follow-up. 8 This study shows that among French dermatologists, there has yet to be a consensus on the management of DOACs before and after dermatologic surgery.…”
Section: Peri-operative Management Of Direct Xa and Iia Inhibitors Fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%