Background
It is unclear whether intravenous thrombolysis (
IVT
) with alteplase before endovascular treatment (
EVT
) is beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion. We compared clinical and procedural outcomes, safety, and workflow between patients treated with both
IVT
and
EVT
and those treated with
EVT
alone in routine clinical practice.
Methods and Results
Using multivariable regression, we evaluated the association of
IVT
+
EVT
with 90‐day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale), mortality, reperfusion, first‐pass effect, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the
MR CLEAN
(Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in The Netherlands) Registry. Of 1485 patients, 1161 (78%) were treated with
IVT
+
EVT
, and 324 (22%) with
EVT
alone. Patients treated with
IVT
+
EVT
had atrial fibrillation less often (16% versus 44%) and had better pre‐stroke modified Rankin Scale scores (pre‐stroke modified Rankin Scale 0: 73% versus 52%) than those treated with
EVT
alone. Procedure time was shorter in the
IVT
+
EVT
group (median 62 versus 68 minutes). Nontransferred
IVT
+
EVT
patients had longer door‐to‐groin‐puncture times (median 105 versus 94 minutes).
IVT
+
EVT
was associated with better functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio 1.47; 95%
CI
: 1.10–1.96) and lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.58; 95%
CI
: 0.40–0.82). Successful reperfusion, first‐pass effect, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups.
Conclusions
In this observational study, patients treated with
IVT
+
EVT
had better clinical outcomes than patients who received
EVT
alone. This finding may demonstrate a true benefit of
IVT
before
EVT
, but its interpretation is hampered by the possibility of residual confounding and selection bias. Randomized trials are required to properly assess the effect of
IVT
before
EVT
.