2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Through droughts and hurricanes: Tree mortality, forest structure, and biomass production in a coastal swamp targeted for restoration in the Mississippi River Deltaic Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an ecological factor, catastrophic wind events not only cause extensive damage to trees, but also affect many aspects of the disturbed forests including community structure, individual tree growth, tree regeneration, species diversity, and ecosystem function (Coutts & Grace, 1993;Ennos, 1997;Martin & Ogden, 2006;Bellingham, 2008;Hoeppner et al, 2008;Zeng et al, 2009). Although catastrophic windstorms are easily seen to have major impacts on forest structure, the longer-term effects on less conspicuous ecosystem attributes such as species composition and diversity are more complex, and at smaller scales of observation are relatively unpredictable (DeCoster, 1996;McMaster, 2005;Oswalt & Oswalt, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an ecological factor, catastrophic wind events not only cause extensive damage to trees, but also affect many aspects of the disturbed forests including community structure, individual tree growth, tree regeneration, species diversity, and ecosystem function (Coutts & Grace, 1993;Ennos, 1997;Martin & Ogden, 2006;Bellingham, 2008;Hoeppner et al, 2008;Zeng et al, 2009). Although catastrophic windstorms are easily seen to have major impacts on forest structure, the longer-term effects on less conspicuous ecosystem attributes such as species composition and diversity are more complex, and at smaller scales of observation are relatively unpredictable (DeCoster, 1996;McMaster, 2005;Oswalt & Oswalt, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean tree height, basal area ( Figure 4) and tree net primary production ( Figure 10) were highest at the sites receiving point and nonpoint sources of fresh water (Throughput sites), intermediate at those with stagnant, permanently flooded soils (Relict sites), and lowest at Degraded sites prone to saltwater intrusion. For the relationship between forested basal area and long-term salinity we expected to find a threshold relationship for baldcypress and water tupleo with decreased basal area beginning at about 2 ppt and 1 ppt, respectively [22,[41][42][43]. Instead, all species experienced exponential decline in basal area beginning at a chronic salinity as low as 0.5 ppt ( Figure 14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Water tupelo, ash, and swamp red maple cannot tolerate the periodic salinity conditions during drought of 2-4 ppt found at these sites [10,24]. Likewise, the relatively low stem densities observed at the Relict swamp sites are primarily the result of the decreased abundance of ash and swamp red maple in the impounded and stagnant hydrologic regimes characteristic of these sites [22]. To date > 32% of the > 2000 trees monitored during this study have died, with some Degraded sites experiencing complete tree mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations