Through Life Capability Management perspective for framework development for assessing and measuring System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness using Architecture Frameworks

Tetlay, Abideen

doi:10.1109/sysose.2010.5544044

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A consideration of the distinction between the terms ‘readiness’ and ‘maturity’, as outlined by Tetlay and John, 14 is of value in this context. The two terms can be described as follows:Readiness refers to time.…”

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, maturity is defined as follows:Maturity is therefore regarded as a part of readiness […], the system must first be fully ‘mature’ before it can be ‘ready’ for use. 14 Maturity is the verification within an iterative process of the system development lifecycle and occurs before […] readiness. 14 …”

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…14 Maturity is the verification within an iterative process of the system development lifecycle and occurs before […] readiness. 14…”

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is fair to say that the readiness assessment has a crucial role ‘within the systems engineering decision making process’. 14 They are less effective in dealing with the uncertain starting point seen in cases of market failure or technology push, where the need to take action is clear, at least to some degree, but where the existence pre-requisites for success is difficult to assess.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology-enabled manufacturing supply chains

Ward

Halliday

Uflewska

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/60978/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge.Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the Strathprints administrator: strathprints@strath.ac.ukThe Strathprints institutional repository (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk) is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. It has been developed to disseminate open access research outputs, expose data about those outputs, and enable the management and persistent access to Strathclyde's intellectual output. between traditional academic research and industrial needs across a broad spectrum of manufacturing process technology. This is achieved through demonstrating manufacturing technology at full scale, in factory representative environments in terms of equipment, process control and operation. This provision helps to address the key gap of full scale pre-production capability demonstration and can be seen to de-risk investment in new manufacturing technology. This paper argues that addressing this particular gap is entirely necessary but not sufficient to drive exploitation of the full potential that is available from the latest manufacturing technologies. A three dimensional maturity based framework is proposed which, in addition to considerations of technology demonstration, also allows the position of the target product application in its product lifecycle, and the readiness of the supply chain to receive the technology to be taken into account as success factors in the potential for industrialisation. Case study examples, both current and historical, are used to illustrate the need for such an approach in achieving future technology enabled supply chains. In combination this analysis introduces the basis of a more complete 'long valley of death' description which articulates the needs of research networks to establish a level of foundational capability ahead of specific client readiness projects in order to maximise overall pace and achieve a level of agility of delivery which is consistent with future views on digitalisation of manufacture.

show abstract

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…14 Maturity is the verification within an iterative process of the system development lifecycle and occurs before […] readiness. 14…”

Section: Case For Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology-enabled manufacturing supply chains

Ward

Halliday

Uflewska

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A framework is required because during the development of a system, assessing the "maturity" of the system definition towards a successful outcome is important, as is the assessment of the "readiness" of a system to undertake roles within the real world context. Therefore, we need to be able to assess and measure, with confidence, a System's Maturity and Readiness within a development program and overall lifecycle [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systems approach for technology assessment and selection

Demirkiran¹,

Altunok²

2012

2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Each system development project necessitates making decisions on the selection of technologies among available alternatives for the system and is covered in the technology assessment phase in the acquisition process. For the assessment very limited numbers of methodologies most of which are qualitative are defined in the literature. This study aims to propose a systematic model, which can be used as a guide by planners or system architects in the multi-criteria technology selection process. The model also proposes a method to define the critical technology elements for a system. A case study on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) communication systems is presented to illustrate the applicability of the model.

show abstract

Need for a framework for the assessment, evaluation and measurement of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness

Tetlay¹

2011

2011 IEEE International Systems Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study has identified the need for a Framework for the assessment, evaluation and measurement of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness for Systems and Networked System of Systems. The advantages and disadvantages of existing maturity and readiness assessments are presented; after undertaking a literature review to examine relevant research papers from both academia and industry.

show abstract

Through Life Capability Management perspective for framework development for assessing and measuring System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness using Architecture Frameworks

Cited by 7 publications

References 14 publications

Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology-enabled manufacturing supply chains

Three dimensions of maturity required to achieve future state, technology-enabled manufacturing supply chains

A systems approach for technology assessment and selection

Need for a framework for the assessment, evaluation and measurement of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About