2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Through the Looking Blast: Geopolitics and Visual Culture

Abstract: It is often argued that the most commonly assumed visual mode in geopolitics is the objective and disembodied gaze of the master geopolitical tactician. This is a charge that has been levelled at both geopolitical figures such as national leaders, and at academics who write about historical and present‐day geopolitics. However, recent work has diversified the way in which formal, practical and popular geopolitical visions may be examined in critical geopolitical studies. Such work calls for greater attention t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This opening up of what it means to dwell in the context of warfare reintroduces Rosler’s Bringing the War Home series which in 2004 was updated, mixing images of destruction from Iraq with scenes of US domesticity and consumer culture (see Hughes 2007 and Ingram 2011 on the intersections between visual practice and contemporary geopolitics). According to Meskimmon (2003, 56), Rosler’s work challenges ‘the sovereignty of western media to depict its “others” through simplified stereotypes designed to keep the war at a safe distance from its passive audience spectators’.…”
Section: Home and Modern Warfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opening up of what it means to dwell in the context of warfare reintroduces Rosler’s Bringing the War Home series which in 2004 was updated, mixing images of destruction from Iraq with scenes of US domesticity and consumer culture (see Hughes 2007 and Ingram 2011 on the intersections between visual practice and contemporary geopolitics). According to Meskimmon (2003, 56), Rosler’s work challenges ‘the sovereignty of western media to depict its “others” through simplified stereotypes designed to keep the war at a safe distance from its passive audience spectators’.…”
Section: Home and Modern Warfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the media and the military has been a vital source of interest for social scientists and theorists (see Graham, 2010;Gregory, 2010;Hughes, 2007). Virilio's (2002) concerns with the co-constitutive nature of war and media representations, Baudrillard's (1995) claim that the Gulf War was only a media event, Mirzoeff's (2005) contention that television coverage of warfare has become banal and normalised within the public consciousness, and Der Derian's (2009) insightful critique of what he terms the MilitaryeIndustrialeEntertainmenteComplex are four significant examples of such engagements.…”
Section: Popular Geopolitics and The Militarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States used film similarly; Ó Tuathail examines the Third Reich in wartime American cinema, focusing on the sensationalised representation of the political geographers Karl and Albrecht Haushofer and their association with the Nazi regime, despite the gulf between their theories and Nazi war strategy in practice (Ó Tuathail, , p. 115). Beyond the World Wars, the United States used cinema to “reinvent itself as a benevolent defender of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ worldwide” (Hughes, , p. 986, citing Power & Crampton, , p. 195). Sharp argues that post‐Cold War American film aims to identify a new post‐Soviet antagonist to perpetuate American masculinity, nationalism, and geographies of danger beyond the Cold War (Sharp, , pp.…”
Section: Historicising the Text: Representational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%