2016
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2016.2592501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throughput Analysis of Proportional Fair Scheduling for Sparse and Ultra-Dense Interference-Limited OFDMA/LTE Networks

Abstract: Various system tasks like interference coordination, handover decisions, admission control etc. in current cellular networks require precise mid-term (spanning over a few seconds) performance models.Due to channel-dependent scheduling at the base station, these performance models are not simple to obtain. Furthermore, LTE cellular systems are interference-limited, hence, the way interference is modelled is crucial for the accuracy. In this paper we present a closed-form analytical model for the throughput expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve throughput optimality with flow-level scheduling, Chen et al [17] propose a scheduling algorithm for fairly scheduling TCP flows in wireless networks with time varying channel conditions.Velkov et al [18] realize optimal proportional fair scheduling when each frame consists of either a downlink energy harvesting phase or an uplink information transmission phase. In a cellular system, Parruca et al [19] present a closed-form analytical model for the throughput expectation of proportional fair scheduling, and the model takes into account a precise Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio (SINR) distribution. Furthermore, for the effective reuse of radio resources in a device-to-device communication system, Gu et al [20] propose an optimal fair scheduling scheme that maximizes the logarithmic sum of the user data rates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve throughput optimality with flow-level scheduling, Chen et al [17] propose a scheduling algorithm for fairly scheduling TCP flows in wireless networks with time varying channel conditions.Velkov et al [18] realize optimal proportional fair scheduling when each frame consists of either a downlink energy harvesting phase or an uplink information transmission phase. In a cellular system, Parruca et al [19] present a closed-form analytical model for the throughput expectation of proportional fair scheduling, and the model takes into account a precise Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise Ratio (SINR) distribution. Furthermore, for the effective reuse of radio resources in a device-to-device communication system, Gu et al [20] propose an optimal fair scheduling scheme that maximizes the logarithmic sum of the user data rates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mobile with a high SINR has a high priority, compared to users with a low SINR. Since PFS is based on variation in channel conditions mainly due to multipath fading, all mobiles get the same probability of access to resources across time [22]. As such, this algorithm offers a tradeoff between throughput and fairness [23].…”
Section: Pfs Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To dynamically multiplex the active eMBB user allocations across available resources, the proportional fair (PF) scheduling criterion [36] is applied as…”
Section: A Proposed Nsbps -At the Bs Sidementioning
confidence: 99%