2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1743923x06060120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throwing Your Hat Out of the Ring: Negative Recruitment and the Gender Imbalance in State Legislative Candidacy

Abstract: Candidate dropouts are a crucial and understudied population; they represent a significant source for increasing women's candidacies and addressing the gender imbalance in office. Survey evidence demonstrates that women are discouraged from running in districts in which their party is strong, while men are discouraged from running in districts in which their party is weak. Are women more likely to drop out of an election race than are men? If so, why? Using election records and an original survey, this article… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically they need a lot more encouragement to run for office, reporting the need to feel "twice" as good as their male counterparts . They face some implicit bias from party elitesand may face negative recruitment (Sanbonmatsu, 2006b, Niven, 2006. They deal with difficulties in getting the media to take their campaigns seriously, which leads to trouble raising funds early (Farrar-Myers,2003).…”
Section: Women As Candidates and Challengersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically they need a lot more encouragement to run for office, reporting the need to feel "twice" as good as their male counterparts . They face some implicit bias from party elitesand may face negative recruitment (Sanbonmatsu, 2006b, Niven, 2006. They deal with difficulties in getting the media to take their campaigns seriously, which leads to trouble raising funds early (Farrar-Myers,2003).…”
Section: Women As Candidates and Challengersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include gender disparities in perceptions of qualifications and electoral viability in which women -despite sharing similar qualifications and experiences to their male counterparts -are less likely to perceive themselves as 'qualified' to run and hold office. Prospective female candidates were also significantly less likely than male candidates to be encouraged to run for office by party or political actors (see also Niven, 2006;Sanbonmatsu, 2006).…”
Section: The Supply and Demand Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tentativeness is likely exacerbated by a lack of encouragement by political elites, particularly party leadership. Research at the state level demonstrates that elites provide more encouragement to prospective male candidates and actively discourage prospective female candidates from running in favorable districts (Niven 2006). This bias at the state level translates into disproportionality at the national level.…”
Section: Political Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%