28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1990
DOI: 10.2514/6.1990-562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrust Vector Control using movable probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of the entire system is much lighter than that of other techniques. 26 Some empirical correlations had to be employed to determine the pressure distribution and the shock shape caused by the protuberant probe. A CFD evaluation of this advanced method was carried through by Tiarn and Cavalleri 27 under the assumption of infinite probe penetration height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight of the entire system is much lighter than that of other techniques. 26 Some empirical correlations had to be employed to determine the pressure distribution and the shock shape caused by the protuberant probe. A CFD evaluation of this advanced method was carried through by Tiarn and Cavalleri 27 under the assumption of infinite probe penetration height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What needs to be emphasized is that the experiment is carried out in a uniform freestream instead of an accelerating supersonic flow like a converging–diverging nozzle flow. Cavalleri 29 attempted to mount the probe within the 40%–60% length of the divergent part of a supersonic nozzle and testified excellent pitching and yawing control effectiveness using four probes with an interval of 90°. Mokhtari et al 30 experimentally studied the impact of a single cylindrical rod penetration height on the conical nozzle performance and found that it affects the vectoring angle remarkably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, overweight components and overcomplicated structures limit further development in future applications. To overcome the above techniques' limitations, a new idea using a simple rod is explored to control the vectoring angle, as shown in Figure 1(l) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 2, the jet vane, movable nozzle, axial movable plate, vertical movable rod, revolving jet tab techniques are belonging to the branch of mechanical vectoring controls [3][4][5][6][7]. A large number of mechanical pieces of equipment cause overweight, wear, and overcomplicated structure problems [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%