2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thruster fault diagnosis and accommodation for open-frame underwater vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the vertically orientated thrusters, either one, two, three or four thrusters can be utilised; one providing control over heave; two providing control over heave and roll; three allowing control over heave, roll and pitch; four allowing improved control over the three DOF with fault accommodation possibilities [134]. The vertical thrusters can be orientated either directly vertical or at an angle of 45° or less from the vertical.…”
Section: Thruster Configurations/architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the vertically orientated thrusters, either one, two, three or four thrusters can be utilised; one providing control over heave; two providing control over heave and roll; three allowing control over heave, roll and pitch; four allowing improved control over the three DOF with fault accommodation possibilities [134]. The vertical thrusters can be orientated either directly vertical or at an angle of 45° or less from the vertical.…”
Section: Thruster Configurations/architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This vectored orientation also gives a higher level of fault tolerance [133]. In a paper by Omerdic et al [134], they describe fault tolerant control of an ROV with the vectored orientation.…”
Section: Thruster Configurations/architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control inputs are exploited to generates a vector of propulsion forces and moments τ that is the input to the dynamics of the robot. The main objective of the control allocation is to ensure that the condition τ d = τ is satisfied for all attainable τ d , Omerdic and Roberts (2004 Fig. 3.…”
Section: Nominal Controller Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar et al (2002) used the pseudo-inverse method to obtain fault accommodation, and it was noted that in case the faulty thruster configuration matrix does not contain full rank, the pseudo-inverse method cannot fulfil the reconfiguration goal. Omerdic and Roberts (2004) introduced a fault-tolerant control system using the pseudo-inverse method and to avoid infeasible solutions performed approximations through truncation and scaling to achieve an optimal feasible allocation. The method considered three types of faults: jammed propeller, heavily-jammed propeller and broken propeller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus desirable to apply fault diagnosis as a first step to accommodating faults. Several different methods have been applied on UUVs for fault detection (see also the early survey [Antonelli, 2006]): observer-based [Alessandri et al, 1999, Ferreira et al, 2011; fuzzy logic [Omerdic and Roberts, 2004]; neural network [Liu et al, 2012] and structural analysis based methods [Blanke, 2005]. Actuator failures were in specific focus in [Corradini et al, 2011],and with an observer based fault tolerant control approach tested in simulation in [Corradini and Orlando, 2014], but vessel-wide navigation system diagnosis has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%