2021
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thulium:YAG Versus Holmium:YAG Laser Effect on Upper Urinary Tract Soft Tissue: Evidence from an Ex Vivo Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In a recent ex vivo study by Proietti et al, the continuous-wave output of the Thulium laser (TL) laser represents an advantage compared to the Holmium laser in terms of a less deeper incision depth, whereas a larger vaporization and coagulation area, resulting in a lower risk profile (increase risk of bleeding and impaired endoscopic vision) and at the same time being more efficient at tissue destruction. 36 In 2011, Defidio et al, 37 in a series of 59 cases of UTUC, demonstrated a not inferior efficacy in terms of oncological outcomes of the TL compared to the Holmium laser. More recently, Musi et al, 38 reported the outcomes of a large cohort of UTUC patients (n = 42) undertaking TL laser vaporization: the authors showed an 81% recurrencefree survival with a median follow-up of 44 months, a very low complications rate, comparable with literature.…”
Section: Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 In a recent ex vivo study by Proietti et al, the continuous-wave output of the Thulium laser (TL) laser represents an advantage compared to the Holmium laser in terms of a less deeper incision depth, whereas a larger vaporization and coagulation area, resulting in a lower risk profile (increase risk of bleeding and impaired endoscopic vision) and at the same time being more efficient at tissue destruction. 36 In 2011, Defidio et al, 37 in a series of 59 cases of UTUC, demonstrated a not inferior efficacy in terms of oncological outcomes of the TL compared to the Holmium laser. More recently, Musi et al, 38 reported the outcomes of a large cohort of UTUC patients (n = 42) undertaking TL laser vaporization: the authors showed an 81% recurrencefree survival with a median follow-up of 44 months, a very low complications rate, comparable with literature.…”
Section: Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 In a recent ex vivo study by Proietti et al, the continuous-wave output of the Thulium laser (TL) laser represents an advantage compared to the Holmium laser in terms of a less deeper incision depth, whereas a larger vaporization and coagulation area, resulting in a lower risk profile (increase risk of bleeding and impaired endoscopic vision) and at the same time being more efficient at tissue destruction. 36…”
Section: Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to Ho:YAG laser, Tm:YAG laser provides maximum hemostatic effects, leading to clear visibility during ablation of multiple UFEPs. Tm:YAG laser also provides a lower risk of iatrogenic ureteral stricture due to its shallow penetration depth 6 . In our case, the change from Ho:YAG to Tm:YAG laser enabled the resection of multiple UFEPs, maintaining clear visualization during ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The central wavelength of Tm:YAG laser is 1.75–2.22 μm, which closely matches the 1.92 μm wavelength that denotes peak water absorption in tissues, resulting in more efficient and rapid tissue cutting. Furthermore, Tm:YAG laser’s continuous wave and shallow penetration (0.4 mm) can provide maximum hemostatic and coagulation effects and a lower risk of tissue perforation, while more effectively destroying tissues 6 . Recently, Tm:YAG laser was used for endoscopic laser treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma, and its use is expected to expand to nephron‐sparing surgeries 5,7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thulium:YAG lasers have a wavelength of 2.0 mm and 0.25 mm depth of penetration. In ex vivo porcine models, thulium:YAG has shown a lower risk profile compared to holmium:YAG due to decreased depth of incision, larger coagulation area, and larger total laser area (68). In the clinical setting, thulium:YAG has shown good safety and efficacy in recent trials, with recurrence rates of approximately 19% and predominantly minor complications (69,70).…”
Section: Percutaneous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%