2014
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e31829f3096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroid Cancer Study among Ukrainian Children Exposed to Radiation after the Chornobyl Accident

Abstract: In collaboration with the Ukrainian Research Center for Radiation Medicine, the U.S. National Cancer Institute initiated a cohort study of children and adolescents exposed to Chornobyl fallout in Ukraine to better understand the long-term health effects of exposure to radioactive iodines. All 13,204 cohort members were subjected to at least one direct thyroid measurement between 30 April and 30 June 1986 and resided at the time of the accident in the northern part of Kyiv, Zhytomyr, or Chernihiv Oblasts, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The stochastic thyroid dose estimates from 131 I intakes that have been obtained in our study were compared with those from a study that was conducted in a Ukrainian cohort of 13,204 subjects using similar methodology (6). The results are similar in terms of the overall mean stochastic thyroid dose for the cohort (0.68 Gy in our study and 0.65 Gy in Ukraine) and geometric mean (0.27 Gy in our study and 0.19 Gy in Ukraine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stochastic thyroid dose estimates from 131 I intakes that have been obtained in our study were compared with those from a study that was conducted in a Ukrainian cohort of 13,204 subjects using similar methodology (6). The results are similar in terms of the overall mean stochastic thyroid dose for the cohort (0.68 Gy in our study and 0.65 Gy in Ukraine) and geometric mean (0.27 Gy in our study and 0.19 Gy in Ukraine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties arise from, among other sources, stochastic variability of parameters used in exposure assessment, lack of knowledge about true values and low reliability of data on individual behavior during radiation exposures that occurred a long time ago. The current state-of-the-art approach in dosimetry is to document sources and quality of all input data, to establish a dosimetry error structure and to characterize each parameter used in dose calculations as a source of shared or unshared error (5, 6). These data may then be used in a probabilistic dose calculation to generate multiple sets of dose estimates for the entire study population, so that dose-response analyses can be performed using multiple sets of doses (79).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed methods for 131 I thyroid dose reconstruction have been described by Likhtarov and colleagues (Likhtarov et al, 2014). Briefly, assessment of thyroid doses from 131 I was based on direct readings (readings of gamma radiation from radiation detectors placed on the neck), age-and sex-specific thyroid masses derived for the Ukrainian population from the results of ultrasound measurements done in 1991-1996, questionnaires on residential history, dietary and lifestyle habits, and environmental transfer models.…”
Section: Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One thousand individual stochastic doses were calculated for each cohort member accounting for shared and unshared errors. The distribution of dose estimates was close to lognormal with geometric standard deviations (GSD) ranging from 1.6 to 5.4 among cohort members (Likhtarov et al, 2014). The arithmetic mean of 1000 individual stochastic dose realizations was used for this analysis.…”
Section: Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the geometric mean dose as reported in [38], this gives an asymptotic RR | 190 mGy = 2.85 (1.51, 18.92) 95% . Fitting the quasi models over C + restricted to agex < 18, Q2d gives RR | 190 mGy = 2.62 (1.50, 4.57) 95% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%