1958
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(58)91088-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thyroid Function in Patients With Mammary Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accord with the main findings of Edelstyn et al (1958) in cases of local disease. Indeed, we might on this evidence hazard the observation that thyroid dysfunction plays little part in the primary aetiology of mammary cancer, apart from the slight bias towards hypofunction demonstrated above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in accord with the main findings of Edelstyn et al (1958) in cases of local disease. Indeed, we might on this evidence hazard the observation that thyroid dysfunction plays little part in the primary aetiology of mammary cancer, apart from the slight bias towards hypofunction demonstrated above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From the diagram published in their paper, Edelstyn et al (1958) show an even greater bias towards hypofunction, for their group with local disease only the group most nearly comparable with our own. Of their 23 cases, 17 are in the Normal group, 4 in the Low, and 2 in the Very Low, making 26 per cent below Fraser's lower extremity of the Normal group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Edelstyn, Lyons and Welbourn (1958) observed such an association during routine studies with 1311 performed before hypophysectomy. It was noted that patients in whom the disease was confinied to the chest wall and local glandular areas had consistently higher indices of thyroid activity as judged by neck uptake, urinarv excretion and protein bound 1311 levels, than those patients in whom blood borne spread had taken place.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%