“…Additionally, the Ti-in-zircon thermometer may actually underestimate true crystallization temperatures (Fu et al, 2009) owing to the uncertainties in inferred activities of SiO 2 and TiO 2 , effect of pressure correction, subsolidus resetting of Ti compositions, non-Henry's Law substitution of Ti in zircon, disequilibrium crystallization from melts, and thus PDL zircons may have formed at even higher temperatures. Nevertheless, the general low Ti-in-zircon temperatures (~600°C-800°C) reported for the felsic-intermediate igneous rocks associated with or without porphyry copper mineralization sampled from subduction zones around the world (e.g., Fu et al, 2008;Dilles et al, 2015;Shen et al, 2015) probably revealed that common process(es) may functioned in the arc magma genesis and/or magmatic evolutionary paths. Carley et al (2014) found that zircons from tectonic settings where there is no subduction influence and little or no continental lithosphere, e.g., Icelandic and MORB zircons, were notably distinguished by higher Ti and middle REE (MREE) and HREE concentrations from that of Phanerozoic arcs.…”