2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tibial pilon fractures treated with a periarticular external fixator: Retrospective study of 47 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tibial fractures managed by plating revealed a revision rate ranging from 8.0% to 69.0% and a pooled estimate of deep infection rate of 11% cases12 . Allan and Sigvard reported severe osteomyelitis in 19.0% of the open tibial fractures treated by plate fixation13 . External fixation has been popular because of the relative ease of application and the limited effect on the blood supply of the tibia, but these advantages have been outweighed by the high incidence of non-union and pin-track infection, difficulties relating to soft-tissue management and the potential for malunion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tibial fractures managed by plating revealed a revision rate ranging from 8.0% to 69.0% and a pooled estimate of deep infection rate of 11% cases12 . Allan and Sigvard reported severe osteomyelitis in 19.0% of the open tibial fractures treated by plate fixation13 . External fixation has been popular because of the relative ease of application and the limited effect on the blood supply of the tibia, but these advantages have been outweighed by the high incidence of non-union and pin-track infection, difficulties relating to soft-tissue management and the potential for malunion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%