Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a classification system that describes the injury pattern of pediatric medial humeral condyle fractures and provide treatment guidelines. Methods: Patients less than 18 years old with medial humeral condyle fractures from 2012 to 2022 were identified. A classification system was developed based on fracture pattern and putative mechanism of injury. Type 1 fractures were characterized by a valgus/avulsion type injury while type 2 fractures were characterized by a vertical shear pattern. Each type was subdivided by amount of fragment displacement: (A) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) versus (B) displaced (>2 mm). Three attending orthopaedic surgeons evaluated and classified each patient’s fracture. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was calculated with Kappa statistics. Results: Twenty-seven patients (16 males) with an mean age of 10.5 years were included. There were 4 type 1A, 17 type 1B, and 6 type 2B fractures with substantial agreement in inter-rater (ĸ=0.62, CI=0.45-0.78), and intrarater (mean ĸ=0.79, range=0.70-0.93) reliability analysis. Surgical treatment was performed in 25/27 patients; 4 patients underwent closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and 21 underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Ten patients required advanced imaging to assist in surgical decision making. Both nonoperative patients had type 1A fractures. Nearly one-fourth of patients (6/27, 22%) had some functional loss of motion and poor outcomes based on Flynn’s criteria, with a Fisher exact test revealing an increased risk of functional loss of motion in skeletally mature children (P=0.02). Two patients had complications including 1 nonunion after initial nonoperative management (type 1B) and 1 patient (type 2B) required manipulation under anesthesia for postoperative stiffness. Conclusion: Moderate to strong inter-rater and intrarater reliability was demonstrated with the proposed classification system. Type 1A fractures are amenable to nonoperative treatment while types 1B and 2B require surgical management. Skeletally mature patients may be at greater risk of motion loss following injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case series.
Background: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a classification system that describes the injury pattern of pediatric medial humeral condyle fractures and provide treatment guidelines. Methods: Patients less than 18 years old with medial humeral condyle fractures from 2012 to 2022 were identified. A classification system was developed based on fracture pattern and putative mechanism of injury. Type 1 fractures were characterized by a valgus/avulsion type injury while type 2 fractures were characterized by a vertical shear pattern. Each type was subdivided by amount of fragment displacement: (A) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (<2 mm) versus (B) displaced (>2 mm). Three attending orthopaedic surgeons evaluated and classified each patient’s fracture. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was calculated with Kappa statistics. Results: Twenty-seven patients (16 males) with an mean age of 10.5 years were included. There were 4 type 1A, 17 type 1B, and 6 type 2B fractures with substantial agreement in inter-rater (ĸ=0.62, CI=0.45-0.78), and intrarater (mean ĸ=0.79, range=0.70-0.93) reliability analysis. Surgical treatment was performed in 25/27 patients; 4 patients underwent closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and 21 underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Ten patients required advanced imaging to assist in surgical decision making. Both nonoperative patients had type 1A fractures. Nearly one-fourth of patients (6/27, 22%) had some functional loss of motion and poor outcomes based on Flynn’s criteria, with a Fisher exact test revealing an increased risk of functional loss of motion in skeletally mature children (P=0.02). Two patients had complications including 1 nonunion after initial nonoperative management (type 1B) and 1 patient (type 2B) required manipulation under anesthesia for postoperative stiffness. Conclusion: Moderate to strong inter-rater and intrarater reliability was demonstrated with the proposed classification system. Type 1A fractures are amenable to nonoperative treatment while types 1B and 2B require surgical management. Skeletally mature patients may be at greater risk of motion loss following injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case series.
The treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures remains controversial. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis compared conservative treatment and surgical treatment (plating, nailing, or arthroplasty) of displaced fractures in adults ‡50 years of age 1 . Twenty-two trials (1,814 patients) were included, and no meaningful differences in clinical outcome or range of motion were identified. Complications were 3.3 times higher in the surgical treatment group. However, the study did not differentiate among 2-part, 3-part, or 4-part fractures. It also included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies, which may have been impacted by a high risk of bias.Surgical treatment may be warranted in select populations. The lack of restoration of the medial column has been suggested to contribute to fixation failure. An RCT compared clinical and radiographic outcomes following locking plate fixation with (39 patients) or without (41 patients) a fibular allograft for proximal humeral fractures with medial column comminution 2 . There was no clinically important improvement in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score or improvement in postoperative radiographs with addition of fibular allograft augmentation at 1 year.In certain fractures in the elderly population, reverse shoulder arthroplasty is chosen for definitive treatment. However, the ideal timing for a surgical procedure is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis compared outcomes following acute and delayed reverse shoulder arthroplasty ( ‡4 weeks after the injury) in patients ‡65 years of age 3 . Sixteen studies were included, and the overall complication rate was higher in the delayed group (18.5%) compared with the acute group (11.7%). Patients who underwent acute reverse shoulder arthroplasty also had better range-of-motion measurements as well as better American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant-Murley scores. The results suggest that the surgical timing of arthroplasty for fracture treatment is important.High-grade injuries to the acromioclavicular joint may warrant fixation. Controversy remains with regard to the best type of fixation. A systematic review compared outcomes following suture button fixation (363 patients) and hook plate fixation (432 patients) for acute injuries (£21 days) 4 . Fourteen comparative studies were included, with suture Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I34).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.