2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tibio-femoral joint contact forces in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress loads of 1.5-3.5 BW patellofemoral were described in cats 33 and 2.1 BW tibiofemoral in the sheep model. 34 Although no data are available in the minipig model, we consider joint load in both locations as similar. As defect size and geometry did not differ substantially in our studies, we interpret our findings based on the distinct shape and geometry of the articulating surfaces in ............................................................................................................................................. each joint compartment: a rather plane and congruent articulating surface in the TG in contrast to a more convex surface in the MFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress loads of 1.5-3.5 BW patellofemoral were described in cats 33 and 2.1 BW tibiofemoral in the sheep model. 34 Although no data are available in the minipig model, we consider joint load in both locations as similar. As defect size and geometry did not differ substantially in our studies, we interpret our findings based on the distinct shape and geometry of the articulating surfaces in ............................................................................................................................................. each joint compartment: a rather plane and congruent articulating surface in the TG in contrast to a more convex surface in the MFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The impingement occurs at the end range of flexion (90-1208 in ovine hips) 13,14 in the postero-superior acetabular area. A pilot in vitro and in vivo trial involving ten ovine cadaver hips and eight Swiss Alpine sheep was performed to test the feasibility of experimentally induced cam-type FAI and to detect the optimal varisation angle.…”
Section: Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 When analyzing all cartilage specimens from all sectors together on the acetabular side, a higher MS was found in the operated hips (4.9 [range 1.5-10.8]) versus the control hips (0.9 [0-2.5], p ¼ 0.001, Table 3 Table 3) when analyzing both portions of the head. In the operated hips, the non-spherical portion had an increased MS (9 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]) in comparison to the control side (0.2 [0-2], p < 0.001, Table 3). Changes in cellularity were seen most commonly (67%), followed by structural irregularities (60%), a reduction in staining (41%), and loss of the integrity of the tidemark (35%; Figs.…”
Section: Experimentally Induced Fai In Sheepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak axial tibiofemoral contact forces in sheep of 2.12 x body weight were recorded by Taylor et al [14], and an average body weight for sheep of 647.5 N can be calculated from values reported by Bergmann et al [32]. The axial contact force, , can then be calculated giving = 2.12 x 647.5 = 1.3727 kN.…”
Section: Compressive Loadingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar methods were employed by Roshan-Ghias et al [13] to generate FE models of a scaffold-callus construct for uniaxial loading simulations. The use of four-point bending tests gives a more complete picture of the mechanical integrity of the scaffold-callus construct [6,11] under the complex loading conditions in-vivo [14] in comparison to the use of uniaxial loading alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%