2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00189-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tick size, NYSE rule 118, and ex-dividend day stock price behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results therefore provide sufficient evidence to show that our primary results, which reveal significant differences in the PDR measures in the pre-Act period vis-à-vis the post-Act period, are not driven by market-microstructure explanations. Our results are consistent with the findings of Graham et al (2003), Jakob and Ma (2004) and Cloyd et al (2006), that market microstructure explanations are not able to fully explain the anomaly of the ex-dividend day price drop.…”
Section: Market Microstructure Explanationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results therefore provide sufficient evidence to show that our primary results, which reveal significant differences in the PDR measures in the pre-Act period vis-à-vis the post-Act period, are not driven by market-microstructure explanations. Our results are consistent with the findings of Graham et al (2003), Jakob and Ma (2004) and Cloyd et al (2006), that market microstructure explanations are not able to fully explain the anomaly of the ex-dividend day price drop.…”
Section: Market Microstructure Explanationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Kadapakkam's (2000) results reporting ex-dividend price drops near one after the introduction of electronic settlement in Hong Kong support Frank and Jagannathan's hypothesis. More recently, Jakob and Ma (2004) find that, contrary to Bali and Hite's hypothesis, after eliminating price discreteness the ex-dividend day anomaly strengthens. They also report that around ex-dividend dates bid prices fell by more than ask prices, supporting Frank and Jagannathan's hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Observing the serial correlations of residuals in the OLS model of Bali and Hite (1998), Jakob and Ma (2004) applied fixed effect panel regression of price drops on dividends and discreteness. They observed that the significant slope coefficient was always different from 1.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%