2009
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200811224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal interaction in High‐Mass X‐ray Binaries

Abstract: Our aim is to investigate tidal interaction in High-Mass X-ray Binary stars in order to determine in which objects the rotation of the mass donors is synchronized or pseudosynchronized with the orbital motion of the compact companion. We calculate the pseudosynchronization period (Pps) and compare it with the rotational period of the mass donors (Prot). We find that (1) the Be/X-ray binaries are not synchronized, the mass donors rotate faster than the orbital period and the ratio Pps/Prot is 2 -300; (2) the gi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we also assume that the orbit has already been approximately circularized by tidal forces. The latter assumption is supported by the analytic solutions of Zahn (1975) and Hurley et al (2002), and their application to high-mass XRBs (Stoyanov & Zamanov 2009), which show that both BH and NS systems with a donor star mass M2 10M⊙ and a binary period P 10 d will circularize in 10 6 yrs, while systems with longer periods (usually including Be XRBs) may not circularize. Since S2 has a binary period ≈2.2 days, and a likely massive donor mass (as we discussed in Section 6), our assumption of tidal circularization is reasonable.…”
Section: Photometric Identification Of An Accreting Ns In S2mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Second, we also assume that the orbit has already been approximately circularized by tidal forces. The latter assumption is supported by the analytic solutions of Zahn (1975) and Hurley et al (2002), and their application to high-mass XRBs (Stoyanov & Zamanov 2009), which show that both BH and NS systems with a donor star mass M2 10M⊙ and a binary period P 10 d will circularize in 10 6 yrs, while systems with longer periods (usually including Be XRBs) may not circularize. Since S2 has a binary period ≈2.2 days, and a likely massive donor mass (as we discussed in Section 6), our assumption of tidal circularization is reasonable.…”
Section: Photometric Identification Of An Accreting Ns In S2mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In Fig. 5 we plot P rot versus P orb for a number of high-mass X-ray binaries (see also Stoyanov & Zamanov 2009). Highmass X-ray binaries with a giant/supergiant component, Be/Xray binaries, and Be/γ-ray binaries are plotted with different symbols in this figure.…”
Section: Rotational Period Of the Mass Donorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long orbital periods and high eccentricities inferred for the system are therefore consistent with the Binder et al(2016) interpretation of SN2010da as a newly formed HMXB. Circularization timescales estimated for known sgHMXBs range from ∼10 4 -10 7 years (Stoyanov & Zamanov 2009), which suggests that the presumed HMXB associated with SN2010da is less than 10 4 years old. We can glean insight on the orbital and disk/shell configuration of the system from the upper limit derived for the semimajor axis of the binary.…”
Section: An Lbv or Sgb[e] Hmxb?mentioning
confidence: 99%