2006
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.20785500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ties, Leaders, And Time In Teams: Strong Inference About Network Structure’s Effects On Team Viability And Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
705
2
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 741 publications
(751 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
25
705
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Another criticism of the method used in this study is that it does not allow for clear-cut causeeffect conclusions (as time-lagged and especially cross-sectional correlations cannot definitively establish temporal precedence [Balkundi & Harrison, 2006]). Although we interpret the data at hand to support progression of withdrawal, the reader is warned of the potentially severe limitations of testing dynamic withdrawal models using inappropriate data and analyses.…”
Section: Limitations and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another criticism of the method used in this study is that it does not allow for clear-cut causeeffect conclusions (as time-lagged and especially cross-sectional correlations cannot definitively establish temporal precedence [Balkundi & Harrison, 2006]). Although we interpret the data at hand to support progression of withdrawal, the reader is warned of the potentially severe limitations of testing dynamic withdrawal models using inappropriate data and analyses.…”
Section: Limitations and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use degree centrality (Aalbers & Dolfsma 2015;Scott 1991;Wasserman and Faust 1994), the number of ties ego maintains in a network, since it provides a comprehensive and most readily interpretable indication of the network structure of an actor and ascertains an actor's prominence in a network structure (Balkundi and Harrison, 2006;Bono and Anderson, 2005;Brass, 1984;Cross and Cummings, 2004;Freeman, 1979;Mehra et al, 2001). While we did not require that the contact corroborate a tie, we did check whether this self-reported measure generated reliable data as we collected data in the full network and with industry experts (cf.…”
Section: Innovation This Innovation Is Developed Outside Of the Sectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a su utilidad, el ARS ha sido aplicado a diversos campos, por ejemplo el impacto de la urbanización en el bienestar del individuo 26 , los sistemas de economía y política 27 , el apoyo social 28 y el campo organizativo [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] . Con respecto a éste último, se ha estudiado la relación de las redes en cuanto al rendimiento, la creatividad, la transferencia de innovación, etcétera.…”
Section: El Análisis De Las Redes Sociales Un Método Para La Mejora unclassified