1993
DOI: 10.1177/089124249300700403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ties that Bind: Central Cities, Suburbs, and the New Metropolitan Region

Abstract: This article argues that central cities and their surrounding regions are highly interdependent, and that neither suburbs nor central cities are self-sufficient. For example, suburban per capita income is linked to central city per capital income, and the price of peripheral "edge city" office space is linked to the price of office space in the central business district. Not only do many suburbanites earn their incomes in central cities, but the authors also find that the amounts of income generated in core ci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, regional governance reform in the USA has involved less the wholesale introduction of a new layer of governance and partnerships at the regional level, and more the enhancement of levels of cooperation among existing local government agencies and public and private sector players. There, interagency and intergovernmental cooperation at the regional level is seen to be a means of maximising the global competitive performance of metropolitan economies (Cisneros, 1995a;1995b;Clarke and Gaile, 1998;Rusk, 1993;Savitch et al, 1993). However, the concrete links between this vision of`entrepreneurial regionalism' (compare Cisneros, 1995b) and environmental policy are not very clearöif anything, economic development and environmental action in the USA continue to be diametrically opposed political forces (compare Logan and Molotch, 1987;Pincetl, 1999).…”
Section: Functional Policy Pressures State Reform and Resultant Policmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, regional governance reform in the USA has involved less the wholesale introduction of a new layer of governance and partnerships at the regional level, and more the enhancement of levels of cooperation among existing local government agencies and public and private sector players. There, interagency and intergovernmental cooperation at the regional level is seen to be a means of maximising the global competitive performance of metropolitan economies (Cisneros, 1995a;1995b;Clarke and Gaile, 1998;Rusk, 1993;Savitch et al, 1993). However, the concrete links between this vision of`entrepreneurial regionalism' (compare Cisneros, 1995b) and environmental policy are not very clearöif anything, economic development and environmental action in the USA continue to be diametrically opposed political forces (compare Logan and Molotch, 1987;Pincetl, 1999).…”
Section: Functional Policy Pressures State Reform and Resultant Policmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, at the most disaggregated level (the central city-surrounding areas relationship), the suburban dependence hypothesis argues that central cities and their suburbs are inextricably intertwined, and that healthy cities foster faster growing suburbs. Thus, there exists a positive externality from the central cities to their suburbs [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, a local input-output model is applied to find that the backwash effect is stronger than the spread effect in the case of the Washington economy [25].…”
Section: Review Of the Central-suburban Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linkages between the two entities continue to strengthen as a greater percentage of holders of central city jobs reside in the suburbs. Savitch et al (1993) show for a selected sample of 10 metropolitan areas that suburbanites claimed a rising share of an expanding central city economy.…”
Section: Metropolitan Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%