1996
DOI: 10.1080/13642819608239113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight-binding parameters for silicon-boron interactions with application to boron-defect pairs in crystalline silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, the k-point sampling is very important in order to obtain satisfactory TB results. 12 We studied the system size effects by using different k-point sets in this article. For the selfinterstitial, we found that the relaxed structure of the defect was not sensitive to the k-point set used.…”
Section: System Size Effectsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…But, the k-point sampling is very important in order to obtain satisfactory TB results. 12 We studied the system size effects by using different k-point sets in this article. For the selfinterstitial, we found that the relaxed structure of the defect was not sensitive to the k-point set used.…”
Section: System Size Effectsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Three additional parameters ͑m, m c , and 0 ͒ are involved in this term. As shown in Table I, GSP parameters are already available for all the interatomic interactions involved in B clusters in Si, i.e., Si-Si interactions, 12 Si-B interactions, 13 and the B-B model parameters we recently published. 11 However, application of our B-B model to preliminary studies of boron clusters showed that the binding energies predicted by this model were unreasonably large ͑e.g., more than 4 eV for the B 2 substitutional cluster͒, and imply that, at equilibrium, most of the dopant in the silicon crystal exists in cluster form.…”
Section: Tight-binding Model For Boronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the three B-B parameters associated with the pair potential ͑m, m c , and 0 ͒ were fitted to total energies of the same supercells, rather than differences in total energies as was done with the Si-Si and Si-B sets. 13 It is possible that this difference in the fitting procedure is responsible for the unexpected 0 value.…”
Section: Tight-binding Model For Boronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rasband et al [23] have studied the convergence of intrinsic defect formation energies with respect to potential cutoff distance as well as number of points used to sample the Brillouin zone. Considering isolated vacancies as a test case, they found these variables to affect only very slightly the unrelaxed formation energy, while the effect of relaxation can be sizable.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%