2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11060610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight Fusion of a Monocular Camera, MEMS-IMU, and Single-Frequency Multi-GNSS RTK for Precise Navigation in GNSS-Challenged Environments

Abstract: Precise position, velocity, and attitude is essential for self-driving cars and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The integration of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) real-time kinematics (RTK) and inertial measurement units (IMUs) is able to provide high-accuracy navigation solutions in open-sky conditions, but the accuracy will be degraded severely in GNSS-challenged environments, especially integrated with the low-cost microelectromechanical system (MEMS) IMUs. In order to navigate in GNSS-denied env… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For GNSS-challenging environments, research has been conducted on methods to account for and overcome the degraded signal. Sensor fusion approaches using monocular or stereovision cameras alongside the Inertial Navigation System (INS) coupled with the GNSS signal have been tested by Li et al (2019) and Andert et al (2013). Other approaches have used multiple vehicles in communication with each other to improve navigation, using those vehicles under normal GNSS conditions to improve the position estimation of any vehicle with poor GNSS signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GNSS-challenging environments, research has been conducted on methods to account for and overcome the degraded signal. Sensor fusion approaches using monocular or stereovision cameras alongside the Inertial Navigation System (INS) coupled with the GNSS signal have been tested by Li et al (2019) and Andert et al (2013). Other approaches have used multiple vehicles in communication with each other to improve navigation, using those vehicles under normal GNSS conditions to improve the position estimation of any vehicle with poor GNSS signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interference leads to an enormous positioning error, possibly exceeding 30 meters, which is unqualified for ITS [2,3]. Although various approaches, such as the integration of GNSS with INS, camera [4],or LiDAR-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) [5,6], are capable of achieving better positioning accuracy, they still require an accurate absolute positioning solution from GNSS for initialization. It is inevitable to improve the GNSS positioning accuracy in the urban area prior to ITS development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, INS has a slowly varying drift, and the navigation error increases over time. 3,4 In visual navigation, the image information to be processed is large, so the real-time performance is poor, and it is easy to be constrained by weather factors such as rain and night. 5 Port AGV working area is generally large, when using lidar SLAM navigation, there are few reference signs, which is not conducive to stitching the map in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%