2015
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2015.1091821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tightening concise linear reformulations of 0-1 cubic programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also highlight how fast the average time to prove optimality increases by adding more slots to the warehouse, even with only three picks. In larger instances, the SLOPP model runs out of memory, which is in line with Forrester [13] about the standard linearization technique requiring a huge number of variables and constraints. The linearization of the cubic term in the objective function in the SLOPP model requires the introduction of O(|O||L| 2 |P 2 |) new variables and constraints, which for large instances of the small set represents hundreds of millions of new variables.…”
Section: Solving the Linear Mip Modelmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We also highlight how fast the average time to prove optimality increases by adding more slots to the warehouse, even with only three picks. In larger instances, the SLOPP model runs out of memory, which is in line with Forrester [13] about the standard linearization technique requiring a huge number of variables and constraints. The linearization of the cubic term in the objective function in the SLOPP model requires the introduction of O(|O||L| 2 |P 2 |) new variables and constraints, which for large instances of the small set represents hundreds of millions of new variables.…”
Section: Solving the Linear Mip Modelmentioning
confidence: 75%