2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-017-1520-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tighter entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems

Abstract: Monogamy relations characterize the distributions of entanglement in multipartite systems. We investigate monogamy relations related to the concurrence C and the entanglement of formation E. We present new entanglement monogamy relations satisfied by the α-th power of concurrence for all α ≥ 2, and the α-th power of the entanglement of formation for all α ≥ √ 2. These monogamy relations are shown to be tighter than the existing ones.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
71
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…see that our result is better than the result (5) in [22] for β ≥ 2, hence better than (3) and (4) given in [21,23], see We now discuss the polygamy relations for the CoA of C a (|ψ A|B1···BN−1 ) for 0 ≤ β ≤ 2. We have the following Theorem.…”
Section: Tighter Constraints Related To Concurrencementioning
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…see that our result is better than the result (5) in [22] for β ≥ 2, hence better than (3) and (4) given in [21,23], see We now discuss the polygamy relations for the CoA of C a (|ψ A|B1···BN−1 ) for 0 ≤ β ≤ 2. We have the following Theorem.…”
Section: Tighter Constraints Related To Concurrencementioning
confidence: 47%
“…for β ≥ √ 2 and t = β As (1+k) t −1 k t ≥ 2 t − 1 for t ≥ 1 and 0 < k ≤ 1, our new monogamy relations (26) and (30) are tighter than the ones given in [21][22][23]. Also, for 0 < k ≤ 1 and β ≥ 2, the smaller k is, the tighter inequalities (26) and (30) are.…”
Section: Tighter Constraints Relate To Eofmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first monogamy relation was proven for arbitrary three-qubit states based on the squared concurrence. Later, various monogamy inequalities have been established for a number of entanglement measures in multipartite quantum systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Polygamy relations are also generalized to multiqubit systems [9] and arbitrary dimensional multipartite states [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%