2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2944680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tightly Coupled GNSS/INS Integration via Factor Graph and Aided by Fish-Eye Camera

Abstract: GNSS/INS integrated solution has been extensively studied over the past decades. However, its performance relies heavily on environmental conditions and sensor cost. The GNSS positioning can obtain satisfactory performance in the open area. Unfortunately, its accuracy can be severely degraded in a highly urbanized area, due to the notorious multipath effects and none-line-of-sight (NLOS) receptions. As a result, excessive GNSS outliers occur, which causes huge error in GNSS/INS integration. This paper proposes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same objective of NLOS confirmation, we can propose another indicator of the distance between a projected satellite and the sky, also by taking into account the uncertainties in the sky extraction, as well as in the position estimation. Wen et al [76] proposed to weight NLOS and LOS satellites differently instead of a simple filtering of NLOS satellites. The method showed an improvement in terms of positioning, but the authors did not compare their work with other papers.…”
Section: Average Processing Accuracy (%) Algorithm Time Per Image (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same objective of NLOS confirmation, we can propose another indicator of the distance between a projected satellite and the sky, also by taking into account the uncertainties in the sky extraction, as well as in the position estimation. Wen et al [76] proposed to weight NLOS and LOS satellites differently instead of a simple filtering of NLOS satellites. The method showed an improvement in terms of positioning, but the authors did not compare their work with other papers.…”
Section: Average Processing Accuracy (%) Algorithm Time Per Image (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMU measurements can be employed to constrain the motion between two epochs using the standard IMU mechanism [44], which can work efficiently in the filtering-based sensor fusion, such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF) [45]. However, the standard IMU mechanism [44] can cause a high computation load in sensor fusion using FGO [46], due to the high frequency of IMU measurement. We employ the state-of-the-art IMU pre-integration technique [47,48] to integrate the IMU measurements, which can effectively alleviate the high computation load in FGO and the accuracy is guaranteed, by integrating multiple IMU measurements into a single factor in FGO.…”
Section: Imu Measurement Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion all NLOS satellites will severely distort the geometry distribution of satellites in deep urban areas, and even cause a lack of satellites for further positioning. In our latest research [40] in GNSS positioning that makes use of both the NLOS and line-of-sight (LOS) measurements by giving them with different weightings and improved positioning performance is obtained. Therefore, we believe that remodel the outlier measurement is preferable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas, the performance of GNSS solutions can be significantly degraded in urban canyons, due to the severe multipath effects and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) receptions caused by the high-rising building reflections and blockage [5]. To mitigate the impacts of the errors caused by multipath and NLOS receptions, numerous researches [6][7][8][9] are proposed to exclude [8,10], correct [9] or re-model [11] the outlier GNSS raw measurements to further improve the GNSS solution in urban canyons. However, these methods rely on the availability of additional costly 3D LiDAR sensors or 3D building model information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%