1995
DOI: 10.1080/00103629509369325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage and cropping effects on selected properties of an Argiudoll in Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While C depletion can largely be explained by increasing cropping under conventional tillage, no-till not only seems to prevent C depletion but also to boost a long-term C gain in soils. This behavior can be confirmed through experimental results (Alvarez et al, 1999Alvarez, 2001;Chagas et al, 1995;Miglierina et al, 2000;Studdert and Echeverría, 2000).…”
Section: Across the Study Regionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…While C depletion can largely be explained by increasing cropping under conventional tillage, no-till not only seems to prevent C depletion but also to boost a long-term C gain in soils. This behavior can be confirmed through experimental results (Alvarez et al, 1999Alvarez, 2001;Chagas et al, 1995;Miglierina et al, 2000;Studdert and Echeverría, 2000).…”
Section: Across the Study Regionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For Mollisols, Novelli et al (2013) reported quite similar results with higher AS in more balanced crop sequences. Also, comparing monocultures of soybean and maize after 15 years under NT, Chagas et al (1995) found that AS in the topsoil was significantly lower in the soybean treatment. Bronick and Lal (2005) mentioned that maize crop residues possess important amount of phenols, a high C:N ratio and high organic carbon and carbohydrates that determines an increment on aggregates stability.…”
Section: Aggregates Tests and Managementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Agricultural management in the extensive Pampa and Chaco plains of Argentina relies on no‐till farming (source: Aapresid, http://www.aapresid.org.ar) that accounts for about 27 million hectares, with an increasing simplification in crop sequence based mainly on soybean monoculture (Durán, Morrás, Studdert, & Liu, ; Viglizzo et al., ). Several adverse effects have been associated with this simplification such as lower organic carbon (OC), lower aggregate stability, modification of soil porosity due to a diminution of its total volume, as well as higher bulk density and development of platy structures (Chagas, Santanatoglia, Castiglioni, & Marelli, ; Novelli, Caviglia, & Melchiori, ; Novelli, Caviglia, Wilson, & Sasal, ; Sasal, Andriulo, & Taboada, ). Hence, the way soils are used in agriculture can deeply modify their architecture constitution (Pierce, Fortin, & Staton, ) with significant consequences on the soil structure and the soil–water interactions (Castiglioni, Behrends Kraemer, & Morras, ; Raynaud & Nunan, ; Reynolds, Bowman, Drury, Tana, & Lu, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%