1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500090202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage and seed depth effects on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) emergence

Abstract: Understanding patterns of weed seedling emergence within a growing season and over years is important to develop models to predict optimum timing of weed management practices. A study was conducted in a field with no previous velvetleaf infestations to describe emergence patterns following seed burial at three depths in two tillage systems. Freshly harvested velvetleaf seeds were planted 0, 2, and 6 cm deep in moldboard plowed (MP) and no-tillage (NT) corn stubble in October 1990. Velvetleaf seedling emergence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have found that while weed seedling emergence decreased with greater depth in the soil profile, it increased with shallow burial (Wicks et al 1971;Mohler and Galford 1997;Ghorbani et al 1999). Webster et al (1998) determined that cumulative emergence of velvetleaf decreased with greater soil depth in a no-tillage environment, whereas its emergence was not influenced by depth in a tilled system. The emergence rate of weeds, in addition to emergence percentages, also decreases with increasing depth of burial in the soil (Cussans et al 1996;Vleeshouwers 1997).…”
Section: Recruitment Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have found that while weed seedling emergence decreased with greater depth in the soil profile, it increased with shallow burial (Wicks et al 1971;Mohler and Galford 1997;Ghorbani et al 1999). Webster et al (1998) determined that cumulative emergence of velvetleaf decreased with greater soil depth in a no-tillage environment, whereas its emergence was not influenced by depth in a tilled system. The emergence rate of weeds, in addition to emergence percentages, also decreases with increasing depth of burial in the soil (Cussans et al 1996;Vleeshouwers 1997).…”
Section: Recruitment Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, research has been conducted to characterize how tillage systems affect seedling emergence patterns (Dyer 1995;Mulugeta and Stoltenberg 1997;Webster et al 1998;Yenish et al 1992). In most cases, the approach followed by many researchers was to study one biotype or population of a given species or to determine the germination response of the weed seeds to soil temperature and moisture without considering the level of soil disturbance and extrapolate the results to other populations and biotypes or to different tillage systems Forcella et al 2000;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the accumulation of GDDs was a reliable predictor of the basic development stages of the weed, as it quite closely agreed with the field observations. Attempts to use GDD alone in models that would be generally applicable had mixed success in providing the level of accuracy needed for useful predictions of weed emergence (Webster et al 1998). On the other hand, meteorological variables (mostly temperature and soil moisture) to predict the probability of emergence have been used by other empirical models (Grundy & Mead 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%