1999
DOI: 10.2307/3761200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tilletia walkeri, a New Species on Lolium multiflorum and L. perenne

Abstract: Tilletia walkeri (Ustilaginales: Tilletiaceae) is described as a new species of partial bunt infecting Lolium multiflorum, annual ryegrass, and L. perenne, perennial ryegrass in the United States and Australia, respectively. The new species is characterized by large, tuberculate teliospores with the exospore ornamentation comprised of incompletely cerebriform ridges in surface view. Teliospores of T. walkeri are compared with those of T. indica and other similar species of Tilletia, and the issue of Neovossia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T. walkeri shares >99 % identity with T. indica, but is more commonly found in ryegrass and does not cause Karnal bunt (Levy et al 2001). Indeed, PCR amplification has resulted in mis-identification of the disease using published primers, mistaking T. walkeri as T. indica (Castlebury and Carris 1999;Ferreira et al 1996;Pimentel et al 1998;Smith et al 1996). Several strategies have been designed to distinguish T. indica from other Tilletia species when using PCR-based technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…T. walkeri shares >99 % identity with T. indica, but is more commonly found in ryegrass and does not cause Karnal bunt (Levy et al 2001). Indeed, PCR amplification has resulted in mis-identification of the disease using published primers, mistaking T. walkeri as T. indica (Castlebury and Carris 1999;Ferreira et al 1996;Pimentel et al 1998;Smith et al 1996). Several strategies have been designed to distinguish T. indica from other Tilletia species when using PCR-based technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…are grown in rotation with Tr. aestivum (Castlebury & Carris, 1999;Pascoe, Priest, Shivas, & Cunnington, 2005). Microscopic method of detection lacks consistency, accuracy and sensitivity, which results in frequent misidentifications of KB (Barry & Castlebury, 1999).…”
Section: Generation Of Diagnostic Anti-teliospore Antibodies For Devementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such a method must meet three requirements: (a) a detection method sensitive enough to detect one teliospore in 50g sample; (b) an extraction method that is quick and cost effective in the evaluation of a large number of samples; and (c) compatibility with available biochemical and molecular methods for identification of T. indica (Bonde, Pesterson, Dowler, & May, 1989;Castlebury & Carris, 1999;Ferreira, Tooley, Hatziloukas, Castro, & Schaad, 1996;Frederick et al 1998;Luster, Bonde, Peterson, Hack, & Russo, 1995;Matsumoto & Bell, 1989;McDonald, Wong, Kristjansson, & White, 1999;Smith, Peterson, Beck, Schaad, & Bonde, 1996).…”
Section: Requirements Of Molecular Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%