2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TILLING mutants of durum wheat result in a high amylose phenotype and provide information on alternative splicing mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data confirmed the existence of a positive correlation between amylose and resistant starch contents in the durum wheat mutant lines; RS values were comparable with those for SSIIa-null genotype of bread wheat and slightly lower in respect to the SBEIIa null durum wheat (Sestili et al 2015, Slade et al 2012). Hazard et al (2012) found a minor increase of RS in the SBEIIa mutant of the durum wheat Kronos (less than 1%) likely due to the different genetic background of the cultivar or due to the type of mutation affecting SBEIIa gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data confirmed the existence of a positive correlation between amylose and resistant starch contents in the durum wheat mutant lines; RS values were comparable with those for SSIIa-null genotype of bread wheat and slightly lower in respect to the SBEIIa null durum wheat (Sestili et al 2015, Slade et al 2012). Hazard et al (2012) found a minor increase of RS in the SBEIIa mutant of the durum wheat Kronos (less than 1%) likely due to the different genetic background of the cultivar or due to the type of mutation affecting SBEIIa gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In wheat the manipulation of the key starch biosynthetic enzymes, such as starch synthases IIa and starch branching enzymes, has permitted the development of durum and bread wheat genotypes with increased amylose content (Hazard et al 2015, Konik-Rose et al 2007, Lafiandra et al 2010, Sestili et al 2015, Slade et al 2012, Yamamori et al 2006). SSIIa enzyme is known to be essential for the elongation of amylopectyn linear chains and its absence result in a drastically changed phenotype in a number of cereal species (Morell et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the change in amylose content, significant increases in resistant starch (up to 14%) have been observed in SBEII nulls (Botticella et al, ; Regina et al, ; Schönhofen et al, ; Slade et al, ). Again, similar outcomes were observed in durum wheat (Hazard et al, , ; Sestili et al, , ; Slade et al, ) and barley (Carciofi et al, ; Regina et al, , ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Even moderate increases in amylose likely indicate increased RS based on the RS levels observed in ssIIa high‐amylose mutants (Morita et al 2002; Van Hung et al 2005; Hogg et al 2015; Botticella et al 2016). Reduction in starch and kernel weight is also seen in high‐amylose lines in which sbeIIa/b mutations are used to create the high‐amylose phenotype but to a lesser extent than what is seen in ssIIa mutants (Slade et al 2012; Hazard et al 2012, 2015; Regina et al 2015; Sestili et al 2015; Schönhofen et al 2017). The maximum amylose content potential is also higher in sbeIIa/b nulls compared with ssIIa nulls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%