The protection of mice against MM virus infection and the induction of circulating interferon by tilorone hydrochloride were determined. Whereas protection was evident with doses of 0.15 and 1.5 mg/kg, interferon was not detected with doses lower than 150 mg/kg. Protection was apparently not dependent on interferon induction.Tilorone hydrochloride, the orange, watersoluble dihydrochloride salt of 2,7-bis[2-(diethylamino) ethoxy] fluoren-9-one, is a broadspectrum antiviral agent (5). In mice, it is effective against Semliki Forest virus by the oral, subcutaneous, and intraperitoneal treatment routes. It has also been shown to be effective against intranasal infection by vesicular stomatis virus (VSV; 2). Its mode of action is presumably interferon stimulation (2, 6). We have investigated the protection elicited by different doses of tilorone given intraperitoneally against MM virus infection in mice. At the same time, the amount of circulating interferon induced by each dose of tilorone was determined.Female Swiss Webster mice weighing about 14 g were treated intraperitoneally with different doses of tilorone diluted in Hanks balanced salt solution. Ten mice from each group were bled at 6, 12, and 24 hr after the administration of tilorone. The blood was pooled, and the plasma was collected and assayed for interferon activity. At 24 hr after the injection of tilorone, the mice remaining in each group were challenged intraperitoneatly with about 100 plaque-forming units of MM virus (2 LD50). Deaths were recorded daily for 20 days. The results (Table 1) show that, in terms of mortality and mean survival time, a tilorone dose of 7.5 mg/kg was sufficient to protect mice. They also suggest that doses as low as 0.15 and 1.5 mg/kg can have a protective effect, although at these doses the results were variable. Circulating interferon, however, was not detected with tilorone doses of less than 150 mg/kg. As these data show, in our system there was no correlation between the protection of mice against MM virus infection and the amount of circulating interferon induced by tilorone.These results are not in agreement with those of De Clercq and Merigan (2), who reported that the degree of protection of mice against intranasal infection with VSV was directly related to the titers of interferon induced by different doses of tilorone. Their interferon titers in response to tilorone were much higher than those in the present study. Since the 50% reduction in plaque count as a method for assay of interferon is more sensitive when MM virus is the challenge agent than when VSV is used (1), we must conclude that the differences in interferon titers in the two studies are real. This discrepancy could be due to a genotypic difference in the animals.