2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/9047679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timber Portal Frames vs Timber Truss‐Based Systems for Residential Buildings

Abstract: A large number of structures have been built during or after the construction of a house or residential-zoned building, which are not built at the same time and/or integrally with the structural integrity of the residential dwelling. These include carports, pergolas, sheds, and barns. The typical method of constructing these structures is a general timber truss and column system. The aim of this study is to look at the feasibility and economic incentive that may be gained from using a timber portal frame syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a excellent deal of large-scale metallic and timber portals round for decades, the concept of this examine was to decide if there may be a possible motive that those portal constructions have now no longer made their manner into the residential construction market. (Far & Far, 2019)…”
Section: A Review On Timber Portal Frames Vs Timber Truss-based Systems For Residential Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a excellent deal of large-scale metallic and timber portals round for decades, the concept of this examine was to decide if there may be a possible motive that those portal constructions have now no longer made their manner into the residential construction market. (Far & Far, 2019)…”
Section: A Review On Timber Portal Frames Vs Timber Truss-based Systems For Residential Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] performed different types of FE simulations and deflection limit tests to validate the experimental data against the theoretical results. Due to the imprecise determination of the shape factor k s and assumptions of pure bending or shear acting to the structures, the deformations of CWBs were accidently underestimated or overestimated with inaccurate coefficient estimations [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%