Time against time: Normative temporalities and the failure of community labour in Local Exchange Trading Schemes

Abstract

Why did Local Exchange and Trading Schemes (LETS) fail to realise their promise in 1990s Britain? This article argues that a core reason was the inability to make community labour, a concept at the heart of LETS logic, function as a selfperpetuating dynamic, in which community bonding would encourage trade and trade in turn would build community. In exploring reasons for this failure, the article focuses on the centrifugal pull of two contrasting temporalities: community time and labour-market time. And in understanding why these two, normative, temporal orders were unable to combine, cohere or simply to coexist, the article addresses three factors: failure in design; individual member responsibility; and wider temporal pressures.

Design of Strategies for the Implementation and Management of a Complementary Monetary System Using the SWOT-AHP Methodology

“…. ) that, inherent to the management of a complementary monetary system, can lead to its failure, whether it is promoted in the field of social organizations and local public institutions [88,91,92].…”

“…Therefore, a CSMS will be stronger the greater the reciprocity is between itself and its usefulness. So, an unbalanced or short-income CSMS-that is, when a given CSMS can only be used to acquire a small number of goods and/or services-causes frustration [91] or complaints [92] in the users as they no longer perceive the effectiveness and usefulness of it [97].…”

“…Aldridge and Patterson [91], as well as Cooper [92], considered in their analysis the weakness that could represent the fact that a CMSs are promoted in diverse and foreign territories, pointing to, in this regard, the mistrust that distant relations may produce in a CMS.…”

“…W1. Lack of training, technical preparation, commitment and organisational weaknesses [2,78,88,91,92]. W2.…”

Virtual currency as an inclusive monetary innovation for the unbanked poor

“…The currency is created as trades take place, therefore having a zero balance does not preclude one from tradingthey will simply acquire a negative account balance. This initiative was started in Vancouver Canada, by Michael Linton and Davis Weston around early 1983's (Boyle, 2013;Cooper, 2013;Peacock, 2006). Its conception preceded a sudden increase in unemployment and low economic activity following implementation by the Canadian government of a policy to limit fishing quotas (ibid).…”