This paper adopts the idea that nationally observed commemorative events are pivotal in the enactment of identity. Exemplified by Anzac Day, collective mnemonic narratives are implicated in the process of producing particular conceptions of what is normative and valued within a legal and political community. The notion of collective memory's contribution to the production of normative and formative frames, and associated senses of belonging and recognition, is brought into conversation with the theorisation of the plurality of law. Interview data from a project examining the experiences of expatriate homosexual Australian men is introduced in order to explore the entanglement of Anzac Day commemoration and law in the elastic quality of normative frames to tolerate difference while also being inherently exclusionary.argument, this paper builds on literature that identifies the law's processual, plural, and distributed character(s), 2 thus rationalising an appreciation of the legal and political textures of institutions which may, hitherto, have been considered non-legal. Moreover, this literature feeds into, and is fed by, an impression of law as an ongoing product of affective relations. 3 In other words, under investigation here is the power of collective memory, as an affective and emotionally textured practice, to contribute to the production of normative and formative frames 4 and senses of legality and belonging.The argument that this process of meaning-making-and law's ability to construct or sustain a particular order or be recognised as operable-incorporates the role of collective memory, and its normalising and formalising function, has three interwoven threads which are developed throughout the paper. First, law and regulatory practices enable the conditions in which a mnemonic narrative is established. They contribute to the conditions of normativity that come to define and buttress the sense of a plural self: a collective 'we'. 5 For instance, the officially sanctioned silencing of homosexuality from the armed forces has a significant impact on the way the history of Australian military history is remembered. Second, law itself depends for its success and justification on social and moral attitudes 6 which can be contingent on, and bound up in, the formation and maintenance of collective memory. This particular point underscores the work that needs to be done, and continually redone, 'alongside' the law. Such work is readily identifiable in the social, rhetorical, economic, and political milieus which normalise, and 2 Melissaris (2009), Davies (2017). 3 See eg Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (2015). 4 See eg Assmann (2011). 5 Lindahl (2010). 6 Hertogh (2018). help stimulate popular support for legislative and policy assaults on, for example, welfare, immigration, and foreign aid.Equally, this work is needed for progressive legal reform, too; without critically engaging with the features of these quasi-legal institutions which sustain a legal and political orthodoxy, they remain complicit in the proces...