2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time beyond traits: Time perspective dimensions, personality traits, and substance use in adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the results of Study 2 were consistent with research that underscored the unique predictive power of time perspective above and beyond personality traits (Assylkhan et al, 2021;Przepiorka et al, 2020). These findings contribute to the ongoing debate about the distinction between time perspective and personality traits (Kairys & Liniauskaite, 2015) by showing that time perspective was found to be a distinct correlate of academic outcomes above and beyond personality traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the results of Study 2 were consistent with research that underscored the unique predictive power of time perspective above and beyond personality traits (Assylkhan et al, 2021;Przepiorka et al, 2020). These findings contribute to the ongoing debate about the distinction between time perspective and personality traits (Kairys & Liniauskaite, 2015) by showing that time perspective was found to be a distinct correlate of academic outcomes above and beyond personality traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Internal consistency estimates indicated that the items on each subscale of the personality traits yielded reliable scores (αs > .75), with the exception of the agreeableness subscale (α = .55). Therefore, based on previous research (Assylkhan et al, 2021), four items were excluded from the analyses to revise the agreeableness subscale. Internal consistency estimates indicated that the items on the revised agreeableness subscale yielded reliable scores (α = .74).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The other remaining scales—including time frequency, time orientation, and time relation—are single items. The validity of these items has been demonstrated by several studies [ 19 , 26 , 40 ]. However, traditional psychometric analyses to determine structural validity and reliability are not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%