“…(), who suggested that the two plastid markers they used were not sufficiently informative for inferring those relationships. The studies with the densest sampling to date included representatives of the approximately 10 major Dioscorea clades (Wilkin et al., ; Viruel et al., , ; Couto et al., ), but only 8–22% of the species in the genus. Sampling of crops and possible crop wild relatives (CWRs) has also remained relatively limited (e.g., Terauchi et al., ; Malapa et al., ; Mignouna et al., ; Mukherjee and Bhat, ; Girma et al., , ; Chaïr et al., ), and their inter‐relationships have yet to be resolved (e.g., confirming the identity of CWRs of D. alata ; Chaïr et al., ).…”