2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-016-9340-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Consumption and Production Costs of Two Small-Scale Wood Harvesting Systems in Northern Greece

Abstract: A field-based study was carried out to determine the productivity and production cost of the tree length (TL) and the wood assortment (WA) systems implemented under small-scale forestry conditions in two Scots pine stands in Northern Greece. Tree felling and processing productivity were estimated at 8.64 m 3 per productive machine hour (PMH -1 ) and 10.21 m 3 PMH -1 , respectively. Wood felling and processing times were strongly dependent on dbh and total tree volume. However, when manual debarking was also co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Special care was taken regarding terrain conditions and the comparability of the selected two stands, in order to relate observed operational difference in the two stands purely to the harvesting methods. Thus, it was confirmed, as in earlier studies, that the most significant factors affecting productivity in both methods were tree dimensions (volume) (Jourgholami et al 2013, Koutsianitis & Tsioras 2016 and extraction distances (winching distance and skidding distance to landing) (Mousavi 2012, Hoffmann et al 2015, Hoffmann et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Special care was taken regarding terrain conditions and the comparability of the selected two stands, in order to relate observed operational difference in the two stands purely to the harvesting methods. Thus, it was confirmed, as in earlier studies, that the most significant factors affecting productivity in both methods were tree dimensions (volume) (Jourgholami et al 2013, Koutsianitis & Tsioras 2016 and extraction distances (winching distance and skidding distance to landing) (Mousavi 2012, Hoffmann et al 2015, Hoffmann et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Work phases were defined by individually timed cycle elements (Björheden & Thompson 2000). For estimating production rate (in m³ per productive machine hour -hereafter PMH 0 -1 ) only productive net time without any delays was considered (Koutsianitis & Tsioras 2016). The utilization rate was estimated as the ratio between productive work time (PMH 0 ) and scheduled machine hours (SMH) assigned to the operation.…”
Section: Data Collection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cycle was defined as the time needed to extract a single load to the landing area. Each winching cycle was measured separately with the delays (Koutsianitis and Tsioras, 2017). The repetitive time measurement technique was used during the winching operation of farm tractors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stepwise regression analysis was also used to find the prediction model of the winching cycle time. Results of the statistical analyses were considered significant if p<0.05 (Koutsianitis and Tsioras, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor-manual tree felling and processing using a chainsaw therefore remains the predominant harvesting method in many regions of the world (South East Europe, Asia, Africa) [2][3][4]. Additionally, the low investment cost and the chainsaw's versatility play a significant role when harvesting technology is chosen in private forests [5][6][7]. The chainsaw's simplicity and inherent reliability make it ideally suited for the harsh working conditions commonly encountered in forest operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%