Objective
Research supports the efficacy and safety of Restrictive Transfusion Protocols (RTP) to reduce avoidable red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, but evidence of their effectiveness in practice is limited. This study assessed whether admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) with an RTP reduces the likelihood of transfusion for adult patients.
Design
Observational study using data from the multi-center, cohort Critical Illness Outcomes Study. Patient-level analyses were conducted with RBC transfusion on day of enrollment as the outcome and admission to an ICU with an RTP as the exposure of interest. Covariates included demographics, hospital course (e.g. lowest hematocrit, blood loss), severity of illness (e.g. SOFA score), interventions (e.g. sedation/analgesia), and ICU characteristics (e.g. size). Multivariable logistic regression modeling assessed the independent effects of RTPs on transfusions.
Setting
59 US ICUs.
Patients
6,027 adult ICU patients.
Interventions
None.
Measurements and Main Results
Of the 59 study ICUs, 24 had an RTP; 2,510 (41.6%) patients were in an ICU with an RTP. The incidence of RBC transfusion among patients with severe (Hct<21%), moderate (Hct: 21–30%), and mild (Hct>30%) anemia in RTP ICUs were 67%, 19%, and 4%, respectively, compared to 60%, 14%, and 2% for those in ICUs without an RTP. Only 27% of transfusions were associated with a hematocrit less than 21%. Adjusting for confounding factors, RTPs independently reduced the odds of transfusion in moderate anemia with an odds ratio of 0.59 (95%CI: 0.36–0.96) while demonstrating no effect in mild (p=0.93) or severe (p=0.52) anemia.
Conclusions
In this sample of ICU patients, transfusions often occurred outside evidence-based guidelines, but admission to an ICU with an RTP did reduce the risk of transfusion in moderately anemic patients controlling for patient and ICU factors. This study supports the effectiveness of RTPs for influencing transfusions in clinical practice.