2022
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2022.2041162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Course of Jump Recovery and Performance After Velocity-Based Priming and Concurrent Caffeine Intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings also revealed that practitioners often considered athletes' training age before implementing priming sessions in the training plan. These results, whilst considering the reported variation in performance responses within studies, [5][6][7]10,11,15,22,24,28,29 may support research designs that assess changes in priming measures on an individual basis. This approach may provide important insight into applying priming exercise whilst considering contextual factors and thus will more closely reflect the type of data of interest to practitioners.…”
Section: Summary Discussion Future Research and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Findings also revealed that practitioners often considered athletes' training age before implementing priming sessions in the training plan. These results, whilst considering the reported variation in performance responses within studies, [5][6][7]10,11,15,22,24,28,29 may support research designs that assess changes in priming measures on an individual basis. This approach may provide important insight into applying priming exercise whilst considering contextual factors and thus will more closely reflect the type of data of interest to practitioners.…”
Section: Summary Discussion Future Research and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…4 Although priming exercise has been shown to improve physical and perceptual responses, a number of studies have also found no change or significant decreases in these measures. [5][6][7]12,[14][15][16][22][23][24] Several factors may explain the lack of agreement in the literature. These include the training parameters used during a priming session, the duration separating the priming stimulus and subsequent performance, differences between exercise stimuli and testing measures researchers have utilised to assess performance and individual characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two randomized conditions were implemented throughout the investigation: 1) Control, where participants sat quietly for the same duration (~15 minutes) as the priming exercise session; and 2) Priming, where participants carried out a low-volume high-load resistance exercise in the morning (08:00-10:00 a.m.. The priming exercise consisted of two sets with the 80 % 1RM in the parallel squat, with a velocity loss of ~20 % regarding the fastest repetition in each set [7,15]. This velocity loss was selected to limit metabolic and neuromuscular fatigue [16] due to reductions in the level of effort of each set [17].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of vertical jump-based testing is not only simple and time-efficient but has also proven to be sensitive to fatigue induced by exercise on the neuromuscular system in various sports [10,11]. For instance, the CMJ is capable of reflecting changes following both chronic [12] and acute training interventions [13][14][15]. Similarly, both the CMJ and the drop jump (DJ) have demonstrated being the two vertical jump tests that exhibit prolonged performance decrements post-exercise, suggesting an extended sensitivity compared to other tests such as the squat jump (SJ) or 20 m sprint times [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%