1982
DOI: 10.1086/160079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent accretion onto magnetized white dwarfs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These diverse treatments produced some different results. Langer et al (1981Langer et al ( , 1982 found a fundamental mode that is unstable to oscillations, whereas other studies (e.g. Imamura 1985;Imamura et al 1984;Wolff, Wood, & Imamura 1991;Wood, Imamura, & Wolff 1992) found that the first unstable mode is the first overtone, and the fundamental mode is damped, consistent with stability analyses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These diverse treatments produced some different results. Langer et al (1981Langer et al ( , 1982 found a fundamental mode that is unstable to oscillations, whereas other studies (e.g. Imamura 1985;Imamura et al 1984;Wolff, Wood, & Imamura 1991;Wood, Imamura, & Wolff 1992) found that the first unstable mode is the first overtone, and the fundamental mode is damped, consistent with stability analyses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Thermal conduction does not alleviate the problem. A possible explanation is the expected thermal instability of the cooling flow (Imamura & Chevalier 1984;Langer et al 1982), so that the shock height and shock speed vary with time. Hydrodynamical simulations will be needed to determine whether such instabilities can change the H-like to He-like intensity ratios by the observed amount, but they should change the ratios in the correct sense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Langer et al (1982), we model the accretion column with a variable cross-section according to the dipole geometry and freefall velocities along the column, yielding a density varying with the distance r to the white dwarf, as n ∼ n 0 (r/R wd ) −2.5 . The density, n 0 , at the basis of the column, is computed from the accretion luminosity L X as n 0 =1.8 × 10 16 cm −3 (L X /10 34 erg s −1 ), assuming a typical value of 10 16 cm 2 for the polar cap surface, and a 0.8 M white dwarf.…”
Section: Model Of the Accretion Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%